United States Department of Defense United States Department of Defense

DoD News

Bookmark and Share

 News Article

Heidelberg Staff Retraces Historical Battle of the Bulge

By Dave Melancon
Special to American Forces Press Service

BUTGENBACH, Belgium, Dec. 13, 2007 – Mass formations of German armored vehicles and infantry quietly gathered along the border with Belgium and Luxembourg, preparing for Nazi Germany’s last major offensive of World War II.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Members of the U.S. Army Garrison Heidelberg staff ride walk along a string of “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank barriers erected by the German army along the border with Belgium during World War II. Photo by Dave Melancon

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

The Ardennes Offensive, more popularly known as the Battle of Bulge, would begin Dec. 16, 1944. The Germans called their operation “Watch on the Rhine.”

Sixty-three years later, 45 U.S. Army Garrison Heidelberg leaders and staff members retraced the route of the 6th Panzer Army’s thrust into Belgium, seeing where soldiers of the 1st U.S. Army, including those from 5th Corps, thwarted Hitler’s plan to split the Allied advance into Germany and capture the port of Antwerp, Belgium.

Along the Bulge’s North Shoulder battlefields, the staff learned about acts of great courage and heroism. They also heard of acts of great cruelty and barbarism, explained by historian Will Cavanagh, their guide for the two-day staff ride.

“Remember that these people were just people. Some were good; some were better than others,” said Army Col. Robert Ulses, USAG Heidelberg commander, during the first day’s studies. “These people were running huge organizations.”

Cavanagh, who has led staff rides since 1986, recalled hearing about the battle from his mother, who lived in the area during the attack, and from personal interviews with U.S. and German veterans.

“Mr. Cavanagh made this significant event of World War II come alive with his extensive knowledge of battle details and firsthand accounts of participating soldiers -- Allied and German,” said Anita Johnson, of the USAG Heidelberg plans, analysis and integration office. “As a result, the Battle of the Bulge became real and not just another page in the history books.”

Being able to walk the battlefields, she added, “to slog through the mud, rain and cold, and to listen to the human perspective that (Cavanagh) added to the battle details, brought home to me that these were real people fighting under grim conditions for a cause they believed in,” she said.

The staff ride’s first day concentrated on the assault route followed by Kampfgruppe (combat team) Peiper, led by Waffen-SS Lt. Col. Joachim Peiper, a former adjutant to Heinrich Himmler and the youngest regimental commander in the German army.

Peiper’s column was ordered to 1st SS Panzer Division Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler, a part of the 6th SS Panzer Army, which was assigned to capture and overrun U.S. positions with the objective of capturing the port city of Antwerp.

The 6th SS, one of three German armies taking part of the offensive, was designated the northernmost attack force, with the offensive’s primary objective of capturing Antwerp entrusted to it.

The center formation consisted of the 5th Panzer Army, tasked with trying to capture Brussels via Bastogne and St. Vith, Belgium. The German 7th Army spearheaded the attack through Luxembourg.

Peiper’s column slammed into Belgium during the early morning of Dec. 16, surprising the U.S. defenders, Cavanagh said. As word of the attack spread, Peiper’s tank and halftracks encountered stiff resistance from 99th Infantry Division. Peiper was forced to change routes several times because of roadblocks and blown bridges.

Combat engineers, tank destroyer teams and the heroic actions of individual soldiers and small units frequently thwarted Peiper’s advance.

As Peiper’s 15-mile-long column wound its way over the narrow and twisting farm roads, several of his halftracks charged over open ground near a crossroads near the village of Baugnez on Dec. 17, encountering a 13-vehicle convoy of elements from Battery B, 285th Field Artillery Observation Battalion. After a brief firefight, 84 U.S. soldiers were rounded up and shot.

That incident became known as the “Malmedy Massacre,” and word of the atrocity spread through the U.S. lines and stiffened the Americans’ resolve. Elements of 82nd Infantry Division (Airborne) halted Peiper’s advance at the town of Stavelot.

Running low on fuel and ammunition, Peiper pulled back to the town of La Gleize to await a resupply column. Realizing that the relief column would never arrive, the German lieutenant colonel ordered his men to destroy their tanks, halftracks and other vehicles and returned to German lines Dec. 23, five days after starting his assault.

Cavanagh explained how stiff resistance by the 1st “Big Red One,” 2nd “Warrior” and 99th “Battle Babies” infantry divisions helped stem the Germans’ advance and bring an end to the “Watch on the Rhine.”

Entrenched U.S. formations along the “International Road” and Elsenborn Ridge forced the Germans to commit and sacrifice many of their infantrymen and expose their armored formations to withering artillery fire, Cavanagh said.

Soldiers of 2nd Infantry Division would earn more Medals of Honor than any other U.S. unit during the fight, and the “Manchus” of 1st Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, fighting at the Rocherather Baracken crossroads saved the entire 1st Army from being overrun, Cavanagh said.

“I hope this ride gives (the garrison staff) great pride in their country, in the past and today,” Cavanagh said at the ride’s final stop in a memorial park dedicated to 2nd and 99th infantry divisions in the village of Krinkelt. “What (the soldiers) did was give a lot of freedom to a lot of people.”

Army Capt. Katherine Baker, of the USAG Kaiserslautern logistics directorate, said she learned several tactical, logistical lessons and to never make assumptions about an enemy.

“Complacency on the side of the Allies almost made Hitler's final offensive a success,” she said. “Allied soldiers had a false sense of security that was exploited. There were simple things that could have been done to quickly slow the German advance, but no one had a contingency plan because everyone assumed the Germans could not mount such an attack.”

(Dave Melancon works for the U.S. Army Garrison Heidelberg Public Affairs Office.)

Contact Author

Additional Links

Stay Connected