United States Department of Defense United States Department of Defense

News

American Forces Press ServiceBookmark and Share

 News Article

Panetta, Hammond Discuss Strategy in Pentagon Meeting

By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Jan. 6, 2012 – Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and British Defense Secretary Phillip Hammond talked defense strategy and the way ahead during a meeting yesterday at the Pentagon.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta shakes hands with the United Kingdom's Secretary of State for Defense Philip Hammond after signing a statement of intent concerning enhanced cooperation on carrier operations and maritime power projection at the Pentagon, Jan. 5, 2012.DOD photo by Glenn Fawcett
  

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

It was Panetta’s first meeting with Hammond, and it came following President Barack Obama’s announcement of the new U.S. strategic defense guidance.

Officials will use the guidance to set spending priorities in the president’s fiscal 2013 defense budget request. The aim is to set priorities in a constrained fiscal environment, as the department plans to trim $487 billion from the budget over the next 10 years.

The British also are under tight budget constraints, and plan to cut 8 percent out of their $59 billion annual defense budget over the next four years.

“They spent a good part of their meeting discussing innovative approaches to defense in an era of fiscal austerity, and agreed that NATO must continue to invest in military capabilities despite the imperative to achieve fiscal discipline,” Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said following the meeting.

The two men also discussed ongoing operations in Afghanistan, Little said. The British have 9,100 service members in the country – the second-largest foreign military presence. The British and U.S. secretaries discussed planning for transition to Afghan security lead.

“They touched on multiple regional issues” Little said, “to include relations with Pakistan and the threat of a nuclear armed Iran.”

The defense leaders also signed a “Statement of Intent on Carrier Cooperation and Maritime Power Projection” that will serve as the framework for increased cooperation and interoperability on the use of aircraft carriers. It also provides the basis for the U.S. Navy to assist the Royal Navy in developing its next generation of aircraft carriers, Little said.

“This cooperation is a cutting-edge example of close allies working together in a time of fiscal austerity to deliver a capability needed to maintain our global military edge,” he added.

Britain is building two angled-deck aircraft carriers that are scheduled to enter service in 2016 and 2018. The carrier version of the F-35 joint strike fighter will fly off the new ships.

Contact Author

Biographies:
Leon E. Panetta

Related Sites:
Video



Comments

Article is closed to new comments.

The opinions expressed in the following comments do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Defense.

1/9/2012 7:13:00 AM
Whether British Royal Navy (RN) will opt for two angled deck aircraft carriers (HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales) is now open to speculation. It is rumoured that one of the development platform is been offered to the Indian Navy to share and spread costs. So if the RN settles for a single aircraft carrier it needs close cooperation with both United States Navy (USN) and French Marine Nationale (Navy) to provide sustained integral air cover for RN in high seas. Sayan.
- Sayan Majumdar, India

1/6/2012 3:48:59 PM
The recent DOD quick-look report shows that the hook for the F-35C US Navy and Royal Navy mdel is on the wrong place on the airframe. The distance between the main gear and the hook mounting is too short. The F-35C failed all its roll tests to catch the hook. This means the jet will not trap on a carrier. Pretty serious oversight since the LM 2007 year in review stated that the critical design review (CDR) was good to go. This will not be a trivial fix. And if it cannot be fixed, the F-35C will have to be cancelled. I suspect that after that, the STOVL variant (with other non-trivial problems) will be next.
- Eric Palmer, NSW

Top Features

spacer

DEFENSE IMAGERY

spacer
spacer