Chattanooga Times Free Press
September 22, 2006
Editorial Wrong About Rumsfeld
The assertions in a recent editorial ("Intimidation and deception," Sept. 14) that Secretary Rumsfeld "silenced all discussion of the need for a post-invasion plan for Iraq" and "threatened to fire" anyone who did are absurd.
The general quoted in the article, Brig. Gen. Mark Scheid, publicly refuted the original article, explaining it was a "manipulation of my words to stir controversy."
The U.S. military began planning for post-Saddam Iraq in 2002. This planning included input from and consultation with all parts of the U.S. government -- including the secretary's own policy office, the State Department and the National Security Council.
A group of American and Allied officers at Central Command was specifically assigned the task of preparing for Phase IV -- the transition from major combat to security and stability operations.
And in January 2003, after these months of preparation, the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance was created to plan for and facilitate the administration of post-Saddam Iraq.
Furthermore, the editorial states that Secretary Rumsfeld "fired" Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki after he supposedly disagreed with military leaders over troop levels in Iraq.
In fact, Gen. Shinseki completed his full four-year term as service chief and retired on schedule.
Bryan Whitman, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, Washington, D.C.