|
CONGRESSIONAL TARGET SUMMARY ASSESSMENT
This section presents the Department’s assessment of country contributions
under the terms originally specified in the FY 1997 Defense Authorization
Act.
Assessment Stipulated by the FY 1997 Defense Authorization
Act
The 1997 Defense Authorization Act established the
following responsibility sharing ‘targets’ for our allies and security
partners:
- Increase defense spending as a share of GDP by 10 percent over the
previous year, or to a level commensurate with the U.S.;
- Increase military assets contributed or pledged to multinational
military activities a) national contributions to NATO’s Reaction Forces
and other multinational formations; and b) funding or personnel contributions
to UN/non-UN peacekeeping operations);
- Increase offsets for U.S. stationing costs to a level of 75 percent
by September 30, 2000; and
- Increase foreign assistance by 10 percent over the previous year,
or to a level equal to at least one percent of GDP.
Chart F-1 presents an overview
assessment of our NATO and Pacific allies’, and Gulf Cooperation Council
(GCC) security partners’ performance in relation to these targets. This
is based on the most recent, complete, and reliable data available;
that is, through 2000 for defense spending and multinational military
activities, and through 1999 for cost sharing and foreign assistance.
The chart shows that all but four of the countries covered in this Report
met at least one of the Congressional responsibility sharing targets
listed above, and nearly half the countries meet at least two of them.
It must be emphasized that all nations make contributions in the wide
range of responsibility sharing indicators outlined in Chapter One including
aggregate resources for defense (e.g., total defense spending), defense
modernization spending, military forces (ground, naval and air), and
contributions to multinational peace operations, cost sharing, and foreign
assistance. National strengths are clearly evident, as are areas of
concern – such as relatively low shares of GDP allocated to defense
for a number of nations – where more clearly needs to be done.
- NATO Allies. Fewer than half of our NATO allies experienced
real reductions in their defense budgets in 2000, and, as a group,
their real defense spending remained virtually unchanged from the
1999 level. Greece and Turkey were the only NATO allies to achieve
the Congressional defense spending target in 2000. Both nations spent
roughly five percent of their GDP on defense, while the United States
spent three percent. Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain,
and Turkey achieved the multinational military activities target in
2000 by increasing their personnel or funding contributions to peacekeeping
operations and/or increasing reaction forces contributions. Three
NATO Allies met the Congressional foreign assistance target. Two of
these: Portugal and Poland, did so by making 1999 contributions that
were at least 10 percent higher than the 1998 level. Denmark did not
substantially increase its contributions, but met the target nonetheless
by spending over one percent of its GDP on foreign assistance in 1999.
For further information on the evolution of NATO Allies’ military
capabilities, refer to the classified Defense Capabilities Initiative
(DCI) Report, delivered to Congress in January, 2001 in response to
section 1039 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2000.
- Pacific Allies. Neither Japan nor the Republic of Korea achieved
the Congressional defense spending target in 2000. Japan and the Republic
of Korea both met the multinational military activities target in
2000. Japan increased funding for UN peacekeeping missions over 1998
levels and the Republic of Korea increased personnel. Finally, Japan
also met the Congressional foreign assistance target by contributing
roughly 25 percent more foreign assistance funding in 1999 than it
had in 1998. The Republic of Korea appears to have met the Congressional
foreign assistance target by contributing roughly 75 percent more
foreign assistance funding in 1999 than it had in 1998 due largely
to a 37 percent increase in official development assistance combined
with a reversal of the 1998 negative net official aid disbursements.
And, of all the nations covered in this report, Japan was the only
one that achieved the Congressional cost sharing target in 2000 --
offsetting 79 percent of the costs for U.S. forces stationed on its
territory.
- Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). All six GCC nations met the
Congressional defense spending objective, since the shares of GDP
they spent on defense during 2000 were all greater than United States’
3.0 percent. Saudi Arabia spent almost 13 percent of GDP on defense,
while the remaining GCC nations had shares in the 5 to 10 percent
range. Moreover, Bahrain’s 2000 defense spending as a share of GDP
was about 17 percent higher than in 1999 and Oman’s was over 21 percent
higher. Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia achieved the Congressional
multinational military activities target by increasing their levels
of funding for UN peace operations during 1999. The United Arab Emirates
achieved the target by increasing its level of personnel. Only Kuwait
met the foreign assistance target by spending over one percent of
its GDP on foreign assistance.
|