SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL: John, thank you very much. (Applause.) John, thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
John, thank you. Good morning. And thank you for your always kind and generous introduction.
And I also want to acknowledge our friendship over many years and what you have meant to international diplomacy and also acknowledge your institution, the IISS, because it has been your leadership and the energy of the institution that has really shaped a good deal of international discussion over the last decade. So, John, thank you, and it's an enormous credit to you and the IISS that this dialogue in particular has grown to be so relevant and important, and will continue to be in world affairs.
It's a tribute, as well, to King Hamad and to Crown Prince Salman and the kingdom of Bahrain for their hosting and vision that was very important from the outset. So I thank them, as well, and I was able to express my personal thanks to each of them yesterday in meetings that we had.
As John mentioned, I was present at the creation of this dialogue in 2004. And at the time, as John noted, I was a United States senator. And I did lead the congressional delegation that first year to this first dialogue. Then it was called the Gulf Dialogue. And among those in my delegation, as has already been noted, leading the president's delegation was Steve Hadley, who has had an awful lot to do with continuing to build this effort and this dialogue. So, Steve, good to see you, and thank you again for continuing your support and leadership.
Among those with me in the first congressional delegation was then the senior senator from Delaware, a man by the name of Biden, who's done fairly well in his career. And as you all know, we're very proud to call him our vice president.
As well as the current chairman, chairwoman, of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Dianne Feinstein, from California, who is with us, and Senator Linc Chafee from Rhode Island. And I'm particularly pleased that we have the senator from Virginia, Tim Kaine, here to represent our Congress. Senator Kaine serves, I think most of you know, on both the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services Committee and has been a very key part of the leadership this last year in working with all of us and supporting what we're doing. And, Tim, good to see you, and I'm glad you're here, and I caught some of your panel yesterday, as well, so thank you.
So, all of you, I want to thank you for your continued recognition and leadership and participation, and also to our U.S. ambassador here in Bahrain for the work that he does every day. I want to acknowledge that and to your team, thank you. To General Austin, thank you, sir, for what you continue to do as our commander of CENTCOM, and Admiral Miller, who commands our Fifth Fleet. And to all of your sailors and soldiers and airmen and marines, give them our thanks, and I appreciated the opportunity yesterday to spend some time with all of them at the base.
Before I begin my formal remarks this morning, let me say that, like all of us here this morning and around the world, our thoughts and our prayers are with the family of Nelson Mandela and the people of South Africa, whom, as we all know, he inspired and led and still inspires today around the world. He was a man of peace, a man of tolerance, a man of vision, and a shining example of the human spirit and what the human spirit can achieve.
His life embodied the hope and progress that all people aspire to achieve -- all of us, all of our people, seven billion people around the world, including the people of this region.
This year's forum is unique and more important than ever. And I think it is more important than ever because of the complexities, uncertainties and the volatility of today's Middle East. Global security is shaped by stability or instability in this region, like all regions of the world. We need opportunities like the Manama Dialogue to exchange views on the full range of threats, challenges, and possibilities and opportunities that confront the Gulf.
Engagement with my regional counterparts is a priority for me as secretary of defense. It was a priority when I was in the United States senate. Earlier this year, I visited Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE. In September, I co-hosted the U.S. GCC Strategic Cooperation Forum with Secretary Kerry. I've had the opportunity to meet and consult with civilian and military leadership across this region on dozens of occasions over the last few years, including yesterday here at Manama. And I've done a lot of listening. Today I've returned to listen more. And next week, I will travel to Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
I'm under no illusion, like all of you, about the daily threats facing this region or the current anxieties I know exist here in this region. These anxieties have emerged as the United States pursues diplomatic openings on some of the region's most difficult problems and most complex issues, including Iran's nuclear program and the conflict in Syria. And I want to also acknowledge and thank our partners, our allies, senior leaders in the U.K. here, and from other parts of the world who we are cooperating with in these areas dealing with these big problems.
As the Department of Defense confronts new budget constraints at home, we still have responsibilities abroad, and we take those responsibilities seriously. Questions have been raised about America's intentions, America's strategy, and America's commitment to this region. The United States has enduring interests in this critical region of the world, and we will remain fully committed to the security of our allies and our partners in the region.
My visit to the Manama Dialogue marks the first time that a United States secretary of defense has appeared at this forum since 2008. Much has changed for the United States and in this region since that dialogue five years ago. The U.S. ended its war in Iraq, and we're now winding down our combat mission in Afghanistan.
The political landscape throughout the region has seen historic changes. Old regimes gave way in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and Yemen. Across the Middle East and North Africa, leaders have promised political reform. And the people of this region are demanding it and they deserve it. Every nation in this region has been affected by these unpredictable cross-currents. And while each nation has experienced them differently, they remain regional challenges.
Many challenges that the region already faced, from violent extremism to failed states to proliferation, have actually intensified, and destabilizing actor, state and non-state actors alike, have adopted more and more advanced weaponry, weaponry from ballistic missiles to cyber capabilities.
As America comes out of its longest war, the U.S. military is building new strategic agility. We're building that new strategic agility in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world. We know that our influence and our leadership depends not only on our power, but also an appreciation of its limits and on the wise deployment of our influence, as well as working closely with partners in helping them build their capacity and capabilities.
Our experiences over the last decade have challenged us to use all our tools of foreign policy, including diplomatic, economic, trade, development assistance, and military power, use these powers more effectively and more in alignment with our partners and our friends. We have seen this approach in Syria with President Obama's resolve to take military action after the Assad regime used chemical weapons created an opening for diplomacy with Russia.
This led to a U.N. Security Council resolution and the involvement of the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons, which put inspectors on the ground in Syria to oversee the removal and destruction of Assad's chemical weapons. We remain on track to destroy Syria's arsenal of chemical weapons.
The United States is working closely with our key allies and the international community in this process and has offered its unique technical capabilities and technology to help dispose of these weapons. This outcome would not have happened if not for our resolve to use military force. Once the destruction is complete, a major chemical weapons threat will be eliminated. This will benefit the entire region and the world.
We will continue to work with partners throughout the region to help bring about a political settlement to end this conflict. We must also confront the rise of violent extremist groups in Syria. And we must work together to ensure that our assistance to the opposition does not fall into the wrong hands.
At the same time, the humanitarian suffering must continue to be addressed. The United States is the largest donor of humanitarian aid for displaced Syrians, and we will continue to support Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey as they provide refuge for victims of the conflict. The Syrian regime must also allow humanitarian assistance to reach the Syrian people.
Even as the United States has led efforts to counter chemical weapons in Syria and pressed for a political solution to the conflict, we have not diminished our focus on the challenges imposed by Iran. For decades, Iran has exported instability and violence across the region and beyond, as it continued to develop its nuclear program. Iran has been a profoundly destabilizing influence, and a nuclear-armed Iran would pose an unacceptable threat to regional and global stability.
Since coming to office five years ago, President Obama has had no higher priority in the region than preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. He has pursued this goal through a comprehensive strategy with our international partners, combining diplomacy, unprecedented international economic pressure, and the resolve to keep military options on the table.
Two weeks ago, the president announced an interim deal in the P5-plus-one nuclear negotiations with Iran. It's only a first step, but it could be an important step. It halts any further expansion of Iran's nuclear program, begins to roll it back in important ways and provides sweeping access to verify unfettered verification of Iran's intentions. Its purpose is to facilitate a longer-term comprehensive solution and to ensure that Iran cannot use this period of negotiations to advance its nuclear program.
We have bought time for meaningful negotiation, not for deception. All of us are clear-eyed -- very clear-eyed -- about the challenges that remain to achieving a comprehensive nuclear solution with Iran. I know that Iran's nuclear program is only one dimension of the threats Iran poses in the region. I'm briefed virtually every day about these threats. That's why we remain committed to ballistic missile defense for our partners here in the region and for Europe.
No strategy is risk-free. Diplomacy takes courage. It takes vision. But our emphasis on diplomatic tools should not be misinterpreted. We know diplomacy cannot operate in a vacuum. Our success will continue to hinge on America's military power, the credibility of our assurances to our allies and partners in the Middle East that we will use it. They have bound the United States together with nations of this region for decades through administrations, all administrations, the administrations of both political parties, from Eisenhower to Obama. These commitments are not open for negotiation.
As secretary of defense, it is my responsibility to maintain America's key defense relationships. And it is my responsibility to ensure that the Department of Defense advances America's core security interests in the region. These security interests include defending against external aggression, ensuring the free flow of energy and commerce, dismantling terrorist networks that threaten America or its allies, and stopping the spread of weapons of mass destruction.
Our commitment to these core interests is absolute, and the interim agreement with Iran calls none of them into question. The Department of Defense will continue to maintain a strong military posture in the Gulf region, one that can respond swiftly to crisis, deter aggression, and assure our allies. DOD will not make any adjustments to its forces in the region or to its military planning as a result of the interim agreement with Iran.
As we have withdrawn U.S. forces from Iraq, are drawing down our forces in Afghanistan, and rebalancing toward the Asia Pacific, we have honored our commitment to Gulf security by enhancing our military capabilities in the region. We have a ground, air and naval presence of more than 35,000 military personnel in and immediately around the Gulf. Two years after our drawdown from Iraq, the U.S. Army continues to maintain more than 10,000 forward-deployed soldiers in the region, along with heavy armor, artillery, and attack helicopters to serve as a theater reserve and a bulwark against aggression.
We've deployed our most advanced fighter aircraft throughout the region, including F-22s, to ensure that we can quickly respond to contingencies. Coupled with our unique munitions, no target is beyond our reach. We've deployed our most advanced intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets to provide a continuous picture of activities in and around the Gulf. And we have fielded an array of missile defense capabilities, including ballistic missile defense ships, Patriot batteries, and sophisticated radar.
As part of our efforts to ensure freedom of navigation throughout the Gulf, we routinely maintain a naval presence of over 40 ships in the broader region, including a carrier strike group, and conduct a range of freedom of navigation operations. These operations include approximately 50 transits of the Strait of Hormuz over the past six months.
Earlier this year, we ramped up our minesweeping capabilities and added five coastal patrol ships to our fleet in this region. We are currently working on a $580 million construction program to support the expansion of Fifth Fleet capabilities. Yesterday, I visited the Navy's new afloat forward staging base, the USS Ponce, a unique platform for special operations, as well as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief in areas where we do not have a permanent fixed presence.
I'll also be meeting with U.S. personnel stationed at the Combined Air Operations Center in Qatar, where we have representatives from our GCC partners training and working together with us. We also maintain forces and assets at home and around the world ready to deploy to the region on a moment's notice.
The United States military has made this commitment in resources, personnel and capabilities because of our nation's deep and enduring interest in the Middle East. That will not change. Although the Department of Defense is facing serious budget constraints, we will continue to prioritize our commitments in the Gulf, while making sure that our military capabilities evolve to meet new threats. Even with new budgetary constraints, the United States will continue to represent nearly 40 percent of global total spending.
U.S. military will remain the most powerful in the world, and we will honor our commitments, and the United States is not retreating, not retreating from any part of the world.
U.S. capabilities are not in isolation of our partners' capabilities. Over the last three decades, we have helped Gulf nations become some of our most capable military partners. Going forward, the Department of Defense will place even more emphasis on building the capacity of our partners in order to complement our strong military presence in the region. Our goal is for our allies and partners in this region to be stronger and more capable in dealing with common threats.
A key vehicle for increasing partner capabilities is foreign military sales and financing. Over the last 20 years, the sale of advanced weapons has helped to shift the military balance in the region away from Iran and in favor of our Gulf partners, and this shift is accelerating. DOD has approved more than $75 billion in U.S. arms sales to GCC states since 2007. These sales during the past six years are worth nearly as much as those made previously totally in the previous 15 years.
During my last trip to the region, we finalized agreements with nearly $11 billion that will provide access to high-end capabilities, including F-15s, F-16s, and advanced munitions, such as standoff weapons. These are the most advanced capabilities we have ever provided -- ever provided to this region. We'll continue to ensure that all of our allies and partners in the region, including both Israel and the Gulf states, have these advanced weapons.
Upgrades in military hardware have enabled the United States military to work more closely, more effectively with our partners and allies in a wide variety of joint exercises, training, and collaborative planning. American men and women in uniform, serving alongside the soldiers, sailors, and airmen of our partners in the region, are staring down the same threats, which is why we take these activities very seriously.
This year, our successful training efforts have included our Eagle Resolve exercise, which began as a seminar in 1999. This year, hosted by Qatar, it included naval, land and air components. It included 12 nations, 2,000 U.S. soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines, and 1,000 of their counterparts. Our Eager Lion exercise in Jordan this year involved 8,000 personnel from 19 nations, including 5,000 Americans from across the services. And here in Bahrain in May, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command hosted the International Mine Countermeasures Exercise, which included 40 nations, 6,000 service members, and 35 ships across 8,000 nautical miles, stretching from the Gulf to the Strait of Hormuz.
Because we must keep pace with emerging threats and technologies together in cyberspace. Last year, cyber attacks on Saudi Aramco and RasGas were a serious wake-up call to everyone. As many in this audience are fully aware, Saudi Aramco, which produces 3.5 billion barrels of oil per year, suffered an attack on 30,000 of its computers. Less than two weeks later, RasGas, which distributes about 36 million tons of liquefied natural gas each year, was taken offline for days.
Such an attack could happen to any of the nations represented here today. The United States will continue to help build the capacity of partners and allies to defend their critical infrastructure from cyber attack, especially major energy, infrastructure, and telecommunications facilities.
Over the last year, we've worked together with partners on strategy development, coordination, and other activities. This cooperation is set to intensify in the years ahead.
In this period of unprecedented change, the United States will also to continue to work with our partners in the throes of transition. This includes Egypt, where we have an important defense relationship. The United States wants Egypt's democratic transition to succeed, and we want a strong relationship with Egypt. We will continue to work with the interim government and the Egyptian armed forces.
I've communicated regularly with General Al-Sisi, spoke with him as recently as last Saturday, and I've stressed the importance of demonstrating the interim government's commitment to a non-violent, inclusive, sustainable, democratic transition. The United States and Egypt will continue to work together on matters of common interests, and we will continue to work through this transition. We will also engage partners in the region to support an Egypt that is secure and stable, more inclusive, and more responsive to its people, and a true partner for peace.
More broadly, the United States will continue to support political reform throughout the region, because we have a deep interest in ensuring that we have a stable and sustainable partnership base in this region. And as we know, stability and political reform are necessary partners.
As we strengthen our bilateral relationships throughout the Gulf, we are also committed to advancing multilateral cooperation between our allies and partners, especially through the Gulf Cooperation Council. Nations are stronger -- not weaker, stronger -- when they work together against common interests. Closer cooperation between the GCC and the United States is in all of our countries' interests. The United States has been a force for advancing Gulf cooperation since the GCC was established more than 30 years ago. This will not only continue, but accelerate in the years ahead.
Our engagement with Gulf nations is intended to support and facilitate, not to replace, strong ties within the GCC. In the council's early days, Sultan Qaboos, of Oman welcomed what was hard to imagine just years before. He said, Gulf nations thinking together, talking together, planning together, and seeing together, instead of individually.
The United States supports this vision and is committed to supporting the GCC as an anchor for regional stability. The United States will continue to work closely with each of our partners in the GCC, but we must remain together, and we must do more to strengthen multilateral defense cooperation.
In support of that goal today, I'm announcing several new initiatives. First, in addition to our Gulf-wide joint exercises and training, DOD will work with the GCC on better integration of its members' missile defense capabilities. We applaud the efforts of many Gulf states to acquire new and enhanced missile defense capabilities in the face of growing regional missile threat.
But the United States continues to believe that a multilateral framework is the best way to develop interoperable and integrated regional missile defense. Such defenses are the best way to deter and, if necessary, defeat coercion and aggression.
To encourage this, we propose upgrading our regular air and air defense chiefs’ conference to include missile defense cooperation as a very distinct agenda item. We believe doing so will allow for continued progress in missile defense and will open the door to broader cooperation and burden-sharing within the GCC.
Second, we would like to expand our security cooperation with partners in the region by working in a coordinated way with the GCC, including through the sales of U.S. defense articles through the GCC as an organization. This is a natural next step in improving U.S.-GCC collaboration, and it will enable the GCC to acquire critical military capabilities, including items for ballistic missile defense, maritime security, and counterterrorism.
And, third, building on both this event and the U.S.-GCC Strategic Cooperation Forum, I'm inviting our GCC partners to participate in an annual U.S.-GCC Defense Ministerial. This ministerial will affirm the United States' continued commitment to Gulf security, and it will allow the U.S. and GCC member nations to take the next step in coordinating our defense policies and enhancing our military cooperation. I propose that our inaugural ministerial take place within the next six months. All of these new and ongoing initiatives will help strengthen the GCC and strengthen regional security.
When I attended this dialogue in 2004, John Chipman described regional security arrangements here as a Rubik's cube that had only begun to turn. And that would take time, he said, to fall into place.
This process, as John knows, you all know so well, is still underway, but progress, individually and in concert, even with GCC nations' differences is impressive and ongoing. No one could have predicted that a coal and steel community would evolve into the European Union. And no one could have predicted that Thailand's mediation in a neighborhood dispute would evolve into ASEAN.
The GCC and its member nations will blaze their own path, their own way, but no one should underestimate the promise that has been nurtured here since 2004, not least by the United States, which has fought for and invested in the security of this region for many years.
For nearly seven decades, America has lived up to its commitments to the security of our allies and partners in this region. Today, December 7, marks the anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor. The United States' entry the next day, December 8, into World War II ushered in a new era of American leadership and responsibility in world affairs.
As the war drew to a close in a little more than three years after that declaration of war, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt stepped in the Middle East, as he stopped during his 14,000-mile seafaring journey to Yalta and back. He had historic meetings with King Saud and King Farouk. And when he returned home to the United States days later, he delivered what would be his last major address to Congress. Addressing a war-weary Congress and a war-weary American people, FDR said that, quote, “peace cannot be the work of one man or one party or one nation,” but he insisted that responsibility for political conditions thousands of miles away can now no longer be avoided by this great nation.
The world is smaller every year. The United States exerts a tremendous influence in the cause of peace throughout the world. He went on, “We will continue to exert that influence only if we are willing to continue to share, share in the responsibility for keeping the peace around the world. It will be our own tragic loss if we were to shirk that responsibility.”
Well, today, as America emerges from a long period of war, it will not shirk its responsibilities. America's commitment to this region is proven and it is enduring. And I look forward to our dialogue, and I thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)
DR. CHIPMAN: Secretary Hagel, thank you very much for that strong and sweeping message, not just of reassurance, but of commitment, and also many thanks for the initiatives that you have announced, not least the call for better-integrated military defense cooperation in the Gulf and in the air defense base, a topic on which the IISS hopes continually to work also with the GCC.
And thank you also for your announcement of a new initiative of defense diplomacy as between the United States and the Gulf Cooperation Council that you hope to launch within the next six months.
I now open the floor for questions. In order to get the floor, you need to put your delicate badge in the microphone with the chip facing the way indicated on the card and press the microphone. And I will then from here be able to call the speaker.
So if you could do that -- and the first person who's appeared is Raghida Dergham. Your microphone is on. Please ask your question. Yes, it's on. Just don't turn it off. Go ahead.
SEC. HAGEL: I can't hear her.
DR. CHIPMAN: Sorry. Raghida, yeah. Press the microphone again. Oh, it's off. Raghida, we'll fix that. We'll move to Francois Heisbourg. Francois? I don't know. Sorry. No. If you could get Raghida's microphone on, please. Sorry.
Q: Okay, it's working now?
DR. CHIPMAN: Sorry. And then we'll fix Raghida. Francois?
Q: Thank you very much, Chuck Hagel, for a very stirring speech on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor and, indeed, stating your current and short-term plans in and with the region. My question would really be about the longer term.
What is your vision of the future place of the U.S. in the region vis-a-vis the rebalancing which is taking place in Asia Pacific? If it appears that we move from an interim agreement with Iran to a full agreement, that the ballistic missile, nuclear, chemical and cyber threats are brought to acceptable levels in this region. I hear in the states -- and I'll put it in slightly polemical terms for the sake of the debate -- I hear Tea Party guys telling me, well, if things get better in the Gulf, why should the U.S. continue to be investing military treasure and blood in this region in order to subsidize China's access to Gulf oil?
And I hear others say, using the counter-argument, the flipside of the argument, and that is, well, maybe there's a U.S. strategic asset to have control over China's access to Gulf oil that is putting both sides putting this in straight geostrategic terms, although with opposite conclusions. So what is your vision of what the U.S. role should be in this region, once hopefully we will have brought into some sort of control the numerous threats which are still with us today, but which hopefully will be mastered? Thank you very much.
SEC. HAGEL: Thank you. Well, let me refer back to a couple of points I made in my -- my remarks here this morning. One of the points I made was that stability and security are always partners for peace. For regions to prosper, for freedom to flow, for human rights to be honored, for all citizens to be treated with dignity and have rights, security and stability are essential. And that's also for economic prosperity, for jobs, for possibilities.
So as you look around the world, the seven billion people today who are all -- all of us global citizens, and I think there's no better example of that than nations represented here from all parts of the world -- demographers tell us that we'll have two billion more citizens over the next 25 years -- we're going to have to continue to all work together, because we have an investment -- the United States, every country in every region of the world -- to advance peace through stability and security and cooperation. That's my vision. That I know is President Obama's vision. I think that's the vision of everybody in this room.
As I also noted in President Roosevelt's last speech to the Congress, that we can't retreat, the United States of America can't retreat from the world. We have responsibilities. Yes, some consider those as heavy burdens. I understand that. But we have found through two disastrous world wars in the last century, that when America does retreat from the world, usually good things don't happen.
We can't control the world. We can't dictate to the world. That's not our vision. That's what -- we have never wanted to do that. It's capacity-building, as I noted in my speech, for all of our partners and every region of the world. We want to use these forums and these institutions and these organizations for everybody's benefit. So that would be my -- my answer to your vision question.
DR. CHIPMAN: Thank you very much. Raghida?
Q: Yes, good morning. Again, my name is Raghida Dergham of Al-Hayat and Beirut Institute. And I noted, of course, obviously, you went out of your way, Mr. Secretary, to give reassurances back to the GCC, saying it's business as usual in as far as the security relationship with the GCC.
But the question is what sort of a security relationship do you have in mind with Iran, in light of the opening between the U.S. and Iran? And why does the United States go on turning a blind eye to Iran's military role in Syria? GCC leaders are saying they would like a place at the table at the negotiating with Iran. Do you think that table should be the nuclear negotiations? Or should that be a parallel table, other than the one that you just suggested, that -- as GCC and DOD? Thank you.
DR. CHIPMAN: Thank you. That's a very important question on Iran, so I thought I might bring in Sayad Hussein from the Islamic Republic of Iran to add to that question and Secretary Hagel could answer both.
Q: Good morning, Secretary. You mentioned nonproliferation as one of the major threats in the region. You mentioned Iran and Syria. You know destruction of chemical weapons in Syria just could happen because of joint cooperation between the U.S., Iran and Russia. Therefore, here you should thank Iran to cooperating for destruction of chemical weapons in Syria.
Second, you mentioned Iran. You are right. The U.S. has orchestrated the most pressures in a decade against Iran. While Iran does not have a single nuclear bomb, Iran has given 5,000 man-day inspections to IAEA. Iran is member of NPT. There is no evidence of diversion in Iranian nuclear program. But you did not mention at all Israel, which possesses 400 nuclear bombs in the Middle East. You didn't mention just a single word about the major threat of nuclear bomb in this region which is Israel, because this is the only country has nuclear weapon. What the U.S. is going to do? You are doing all pressures against Iran, while Iran doesn't have any nuclear bomb, and you are doing nothing about Israel, while you know Israelis, they have nuclear bombs.
DR. CHIPMAN: Thank you. Go ahead with those two.
SEC. HAGEL: As to the last comment, I would just refer you back to Iran being in violation of many United Nations resolutions. And the international community is pretty clear on Iran's position, past positions. We are all -- the P5-plus-one, I think the world community is hopeful, but, as I said in my comments, very clear-eyed about trying to get to a position over the next six months that focuses on complete, unfettered verification efforts by the IAEA inside of Iran, and there are other dimensions to that relationship.
As to the second -- or to the first question, I go back, again, to a comment I made that, if you recall, I said, in relationship to Iran and our efforts with the P5-plus-one and the six-month interim agreement, that our posture, the United States military posture here in this area, other areas, would not change.
And I also said, yes, it's about nuclear weapons, but I also noted that Iran represented other threats and that we would take those and are taking all of this into consideration and must take all this into consideration as we move forward.
So we will continue to work with our partners, with the United Nations, with the IAEA, but, make no mistake, our position, our posture, our commitment to our allies in this region and around the world remains the same, regardless of the interim agreement or any agreements that may come after six months. Thank you.
DR. CHIPMAN: Amy Kellogg?
Q: Secretary Hagel, I wanted to ask you a little bit about the threat posed by extremism in the region, Al Qaeda or Al Qaeda-affiliated groups. We hear about the threat receding and then being on the run, but I'm wondering how you would assess it today as we sit here, its strength relative to the last decade and what we're doing about it. Thank you.
SEC. HAGEL: Thank you. Well, first, terrorism is with us in all forms still today. It will continue to be a serious threat to all nations, all peoples. But to acknowledge the progress that has been made, significant progress over the last few years in particular, the tremendous progress in destroying the core of Al Qaida, Al Qaida leadership, Al Qaida is not gone. We know that. We have Al Qaida of the Arabian Peninsula that is now in the different parallel groups that are associated with Al Qaida, are still part of the threats in Syria, other parts of the Middle East. We know that.
But we should not dismiss the progress that has been made, significant progress that has been made. And these -- these threats will continue the longer we as nations have any daylight between us in our own cooperation of our -- of our own and regional and world common interests of eradicating these threats. We all have a common interest. We may have political differences. We may have other differences. But the common interest for security and stability and peace and allowing all people and all individuals rights and possibilities for their lives is also connected to this.
So, yes, we have more work to do. We will continue to work very hard, all of us together. We continue to stay focused on this, recognizing the realities of these threats. We've also made considerable progress against these most sophisticated terrorist organizations, including Al Qaida.
DR. CHIPMAN: Secretary Hagel, thank you very much for your remarks and for engaging in this dialogue. I mentioned at 9:00 a.m. exactly that one of the things we learned from the military was punctuality. It's now 9:45 a.m. And one of the important purposes that the Manama Dialogue serves is to permit the ministers attending to engage in formal bilateral meetings that help to advance defense diplomacy between themselves. Secretary Hagel has just one such meeting now at 9:45 a.m. I want to thank him for his very important address that bears re-reading and for his dialogue with this audience. Thank you very much. (Applause.)