1 00:00:00,640 --> 00:00:02,530 - Good morning, welcome. 2 00:00:02,530 --> 00:00:04,820 Today we are meeting to discuss 3 00:00:04,820 --> 00:00:08,627 the Pentagon's effort to audit itself. 4 00:00:08,627 --> 00:00:09,885 And basically better understand 5 00:00:09,885 --> 00:00:12,330 where they're spending their money, 6 00:00:12,330 --> 00:00:14,290 which is an incredibly important undertaking. 7 00:00:14,290 --> 00:00:16,370 And we're joined by four witnesses 8 00:00:16,370 --> 00:00:18,030 from the Department of Defense, 9 00:00:18,030 --> 00:00:19,440 the Honorable David Norquist, 10 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:23,090 who is the Undersecretary of Defense, the Comptroller. 11 00:00:23,090 --> 00:00:23,923 Welcome. 12 00:00:23,923 --> 00:00:24,910 The Honorable Thomas Harker, 13 00:00:24,910 --> 00:00:27,320 who's the Assistant Secretary of the Navy 14 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:29,440 for Financial Management and Comptroller, 15 00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:30,840 the Honorable John Roth, 16 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,050 Assistant Secretary of the Air Force. 17 00:00:33,050 --> 00:00:34,790 You're sensing a theme here, 18 00:00:34,790 --> 00:00:36,680 Financial Management and Comptroller, 19 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:38,760 and the Honorable John Whitley, 20 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:40,550 Assistant Secretary of the Army, 21 00:00:40,550 --> 00:00:42,170 who has the same position there. 22 00:00:42,170 --> 00:00:43,790 Thank you all for being here. 23 00:00:43,790 --> 00:00:45,630 And this is a subject I think every member 24 00:00:45,630 --> 00:00:48,420 of the committee has been very focused on. 25 00:00:48,420 --> 00:00:50,020 And it's all about greater efficiency 26 00:00:50,020 --> 00:00:52,220 and greater accountability within the Pentagon. 27 00:00:52,220 --> 00:00:54,560 It is, I don't know if it's the world's 28 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:57,380 largest bureaucracy but it's probably pretty close. 29 00:00:57,380 --> 00:01:01,590 And spending north of 700 billion dollars a year now, 30 00:01:01,590 --> 00:01:05,870 it is a large organization to understand and control. 31 00:01:05,870 --> 00:01:07,110 But I think the one thing everyone 32 00:01:07,110 --> 00:01:10,160 in this room agrees with is we can do better 33 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:12,410 in terms of understanding how the money is spent, 34 00:01:12,410 --> 00:01:16,097 where it goes, and make sure that we are spending 35 00:01:16,097 --> 00:01:17,160 that we are spending that money efficiently. 36 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:18,790 And this is an incredibly important issue. 37 00:01:18,790 --> 00:01:21,350 Because taxpayers want to know, 38 00:01:21,350 --> 00:01:23,090 whether it's the Pentagon or anyplace else 39 00:01:23,090 --> 00:01:24,860 that their money is being well spent. 40 00:01:24,860 --> 00:01:26,890 Whatever it's going for, at least we understand 41 00:01:26,890 --> 00:01:28,500 what it is, and the Pentagon 42 00:01:28,500 --> 00:01:31,330 has not really met that standard. 43 00:01:31,330 --> 00:01:34,260 Too large, too bureaucratic has a number 44 00:01:34,260 --> 00:01:35,903 of stories have documented, 45 00:01:35,903 --> 00:01:38,400 can't even really keep track of all the inventory 46 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:40,280 within the Pentagon, and in many instances 47 00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:43,220 can't adequately explain how you spent the money 48 00:01:43,220 --> 00:01:45,250 you spent the previous year. 49 00:01:45,250 --> 00:01:47,763 So then when we are exercising oversight 50 00:01:47,763 --> 00:01:50,940 from the Armed Services committee trying to figure out 51 00:01:50,940 --> 00:01:52,040 how do we better spend the money, 52 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:54,000 what programs work, what programs don't work. 53 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:56,510 We don't have the metrics to really make 54 00:01:56,510 --> 00:02:00,080 as informed a decision as we would like to be able to make. 55 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,240 Those decisions will always be difficult no matter what. 56 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:05,180 But if we can see the money, understand it, 57 00:02:05,180 --> 00:02:08,040 where it's spent, what the result was, it's better. 58 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:10,610 Now I also understand part of the problem 59 00:02:10,610 --> 00:02:14,070 is there are computer and IT systems going back decades 60 00:02:14,070 --> 00:02:16,860 that have not really been updated sufficiently 61 00:02:16,860 --> 00:02:19,237 to keep track of what they need to keep track of. 62 00:02:19,237 --> 00:02:21,340 But the biggest question that I have, 63 00:02:21,340 --> 00:02:24,080 is we all can understand to some degree 64 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:26,500 what a full audit would look like. 65 00:02:26,500 --> 00:02:28,749 You know if you have a business and you audit it 66 00:02:28,749 --> 00:02:31,970 penny by penny and you understand exactly where it's going. 67 00:02:31,970 --> 00:02:34,580 And I think we can all agree it's gonna be awhile 68 00:02:34,580 --> 00:02:36,404 before the Pentagon gets to that point. 69 00:02:36,404 --> 00:02:39,670 But if we can learn how are we progressing. 70 00:02:39,670 --> 00:02:41,710 How is it better this year than it was last, 71 00:02:41,710 --> 00:02:42,900 and it was five years ago. 72 00:02:42,900 --> 00:02:45,640 What are you doing to give us that greater understanding 73 00:02:45,640 --> 00:02:46,967 of how the money is being spent 74 00:02:46,967 --> 00:02:49,650 and what the results of that spending are. 75 00:02:49,650 --> 00:02:51,530 And then what can we do going forward. 76 00:02:51,530 --> 00:02:54,690 What's the next steps as we move towards that point 77 00:02:54,690 --> 00:02:56,706 where we have the full understandable audit. 78 00:02:56,706 --> 00:02:59,903 What are the sort of steps along the way 79 00:02:59,903 --> 00:03:02,850 that we can get to a better place on. 80 00:03:02,850 --> 00:03:04,940 Those are the questions I'm most interested in. 81 00:03:04,940 --> 00:03:06,440 I thank you all for being here. 82 00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:08,770 I do, I have an interview to do at 10:40. 83 00:03:08,770 --> 00:03:11,413 So I'm gonna duck out briefly at that point. 84 00:03:12,570 --> 00:03:13,490 But I'll be back. 85 00:03:13,490 --> 00:03:14,860 And Mr. Brown will take over 86 00:03:14,860 --> 00:03:16,880 the chair in that timeframe. 87 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:17,830 And with that I turn it over 88 00:03:17,830 --> 00:03:20,500 to the ranking member Mr. Thornberry. 89 00:03:20,500 --> 00:03:21,333 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 90 00:03:21,333 --> 00:03:25,850 And I wanna start by congratulating you Mr. Norquist 91 00:03:25,850 --> 00:03:28,700 as well as the team at the Pentagon, 92 00:03:28,700 --> 00:03:32,600 and the people at the Pentagon for the past several years 93 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:35,300 who have worked incredibly hard 94 00:03:35,300 --> 00:03:39,430 to get us to the point where the entire 95 00:03:39,430 --> 00:03:42,890 Department of Defense could be subject to an audit. 96 00:03:42,890 --> 00:03:46,120 It turns out that it was in 1990 97 00:03:47,410 --> 00:03:50,440 that Congress passed the law that required 98 00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:54,489 all government departments to be 99 00:03:54,489 --> 00:03:55,322 (clears throat) 100 00:03:55,322 --> 00:03:58,520 excuse me, to be audited. 101 00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:02,740 And from 2002 to the current day 102 00:04:02,740 --> 00:04:07,230 there has been some provision in the NDAA 103 00:04:07,230 --> 00:04:12,230 to drive us closer to actually having the audit take place. 104 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:19,360 One of the notable provisions was in the fiscal year 2014 105 00:04:19,722 --> 00:04:23,380 NDAA we required that the full scope audit 106 00:04:23,380 --> 00:04:28,380 be performed beginning in fiscal year 2018. 107 00:04:28,540 --> 00:04:30,720 A lot of people were skeptical 108 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:34,213 about whether it could occur, and it did occur. 109 00:04:35,291 --> 00:04:39,350 And so I think the first thing to say is congratulations. 110 00:04:39,350 --> 00:04:41,200 And I particularly wanna point out 111 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:45,140 the persistent knowledgeable engagement 112 00:04:45,140 --> 00:04:48,420 of our colleague Mr. Conaway, 113 00:04:48,420 --> 00:04:51,220 who from the time that he joined this committee 114 00:04:51,220 --> 00:04:56,100 has been on this issue based on his expertise, 115 00:04:56,100 --> 00:04:59,370 and his understanding of what it can help achieve, 116 00:04:59,370 --> 00:05:00,570 and has not let up. 117 00:05:00,570 --> 00:05:03,640 But he also kept us from changing the goal post. 118 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:05,210 Because there's always, 119 00:05:05,210 --> 00:05:08,040 I say every year from 2002 there was some 120 00:05:08,040 --> 00:05:09,500 provision about the audit, 121 00:05:09,500 --> 00:05:11,020 but there was also a temptation 122 00:05:11,020 --> 00:05:13,800 to keep moving the goal post, 123 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:18,800 and keep changing what we asked you all to do. 124 00:05:18,950 --> 00:05:22,489 He kept us with some discipline focused on it, 125 00:05:22,489 --> 00:05:26,970 and now it is, it has begun. 126 00:05:26,970 --> 00:05:29,320 And it is just a beginning as I'm sure 127 00:05:29,320 --> 00:05:31,210 you all will talk about. 128 00:05:31,210 --> 00:05:32,880 I find there's misunderstandings 129 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:36,113 about what an audit can and cannot do. 130 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:41,600 As I understand it y'all can correct me if you need to, 131 00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:43,600 but a clean audit does not guarantee 132 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:45,420 that you don't waste money. 133 00:05:45,420 --> 00:05:49,094 A clean audit does not guarantee 134 00:05:49,094 --> 00:05:51,290 that you can defend the country, 135 00:05:51,290 --> 00:05:54,190 with the technologies, and the weapons, 136 00:05:54,190 --> 00:05:56,100 and the people that you need to. 137 00:05:56,100 --> 00:05:58,150 But as the Chairman mentioned, 138 00:05:58,150 --> 00:06:01,649 a clean audit can help us make better decisions 139 00:06:01,649 --> 00:06:05,810 by understanding better how much 140 00:06:05,810 --> 00:06:10,530 and on what we are using our resources. 141 00:06:10,530 --> 00:06:15,530 Finally I just note that for the fiscal year 2018 audit 142 00:06:15,854 --> 00:06:20,440 about half of the issues that arose 143 00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:22,663 were related to cyber and IT. 144 00:06:23,938 --> 00:06:28,938 Another 500 or so were related to financial reporting. 145 00:06:30,090 --> 00:06:33,820 So I do think we on this committee 146 00:06:33,820 --> 00:06:35,460 and in Congress need to pay attention 147 00:06:35,460 --> 00:06:38,410 to make sure that we don't take actions 148 00:06:38,410 --> 00:06:42,790 that make it more difficult to achieve 149 00:06:42,790 --> 00:06:45,370 some day a clean finding of the audit. 150 00:06:45,370 --> 00:06:47,990 For example slowing down movement to the cloud 151 00:06:47,990 --> 00:06:49,517 may be one of those things that make it harder 152 00:06:49,517 --> 00:06:52,550 to have data that is compatible, 153 00:06:52,550 --> 00:06:56,603 and that's where a lot of these issues have arisen. 154 00:06:57,724 --> 00:07:00,350 I think this is a good start. 155 00:07:00,350 --> 00:07:01,440 It's something that we've been 156 00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:03,913 pushing toward for a long time. 157 00:07:05,300 --> 00:07:07,830 Y'all deserve congratulations. 158 00:07:07,830 --> 00:07:09,280 But obviously now you know where 159 00:07:09,280 --> 00:07:11,380 the problems or the issues are, 160 00:07:11,380 --> 00:07:13,993 and together we need to go fix those. 161 00:07:16,760 --> 00:07:17,593 - Thank you. 162 00:07:17,593 --> 00:07:18,880 Mr. Norquist 163 00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:21,040 - Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Thornberry, 164 00:07:21,040 --> 00:07:23,030 distinguished members of the committee, 165 00:07:23,030 --> 00:07:25,390 I appreciate the opportunity to testify 166 00:07:25,390 --> 00:07:28,343 before you today on the financial statement audit, 167 00:07:28,343 --> 00:07:31,350 a key priority for the Department of Defense. 168 00:07:31,350 --> 00:07:33,490 I'm joined by the service financial managers 169 00:07:33,490 --> 00:07:35,180 who are prepared to answer your questions 170 00:07:35,180 --> 00:07:38,020 on their respective service audits. 171 00:07:38,020 --> 00:07:39,512 I'd like to start by thanking you 172 00:07:39,512 --> 00:07:42,810 for your unwavering support for the Department of Defense, 173 00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:46,490 as well as your support for and interest in the audit. 174 00:07:46,490 --> 00:07:50,400 Until last year DOD was the only large federal agency 175 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:53,440 not under full financial statement audit. 176 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:56,310 Together we have changed that. 177 00:07:56,310 --> 00:07:58,650 Now audits are not new to the Department of Defense. 178 00:07:58,650 --> 00:08:00,880 Numerous audits covering covering program performance, 179 00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,360 and contract costs are completed each year 180 00:08:03,360 --> 00:08:05,050 by the Government Accountability Office, 181 00:08:05,050 --> 00:08:07,120 the Defense Contract Audit Agency, 182 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:08,440 the Department of Defense Office 183 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:11,540 of the Inspector General, and the Service Audit Agencies. 184 00:08:11,540 --> 00:08:14,700 But financial statement audits are different. 185 00:08:14,700 --> 00:08:16,290 They are comprehensive. 186 00:08:16,290 --> 00:08:17,830 The occur annually. 187 00:08:17,830 --> 00:08:20,780 And they cover more than financial management. 188 00:08:20,780 --> 00:08:22,210 For example they include verifying 189 00:08:22,210 --> 00:08:25,100 the account, location, and condition 190 00:08:25,100 --> 00:08:28,870 of our military equipment, real property, and inventory. 191 00:08:28,870 --> 00:08:32,140 It tests security vulnerabilities in our business systems, 192 00:08:32,140 --> 00:08:35,280 and validating accuracy of personnel records and actions, 193 00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:37,910 such as promotions and separations. 194 00:08:37,910 --> 00:08:39,210 For example the audit has looked 195 00:08:39,210 --> 00:08:41,570 at the Navy's database of real property, 196 00:08:41,570 --> 00:08:44,100 to include buildings, underground water pipes, 197 00:08:44,100 --> 00:08:46,936 fence lines, pulled a statistical sample 198 00:08:46,936 --> 00:08:48,990 and then went to the relevant bases 199 00:08:48,990 --> 00:08:51,450 and checked to see if they could locate each item 200 00:08:51,450 --> 00:08:53,460 and what condition it was in. 201 00:08:53,460 --> 00:08:54,700 They also looked around the base 202 00:08:54,700 --> 00:08:56,360 for other property that ought to have been 203 00:08:56,360 --> 00:08:59,030 in the property system and wasn't. 204 00:08:59,030 --> 00:09:03,660 The audit was extensive with 2.7 trillion in assets, 205 00:09:03,660 --> 00:09:06,000 and 2.6 trillion in liabilities, 206 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:09,030 it involved approximately 1200 auditors 207 00:09:09,030 --> 00:09:11,510 reviewing hundreds of thousands of items over the course 208 00:09:11,510 --> 00:09:15,820 of 900 site visits to 600 different locations. 209 00:09:15,820 --> 00:09:17,570 So what was the result. 210 00:09:17,570 --> 00:09:19,760 Six organizations received unmodified 211 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:22,340 audit opinions which is the highest rating. 212 00:09:22,340 --> 00:09:24,010 Two received modified opinions, 213 00:09:24,010 --> 00:09:27,180 which means the data is right with some modest exceptions. 214 00:09:27,180 --> 00:09:30,240 And the remaining organizations, the majority, 215 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,160 received a disclaimer, and many of them, 216 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:34,690 this was their first year under audit. 217 00:09:34,690 --> 00:09:36,590 The disclaimer means that the auditor 218 00:09:36,590 --> 00:09:38,950 did not have enough evidence to provide an opinion. 219 00:09:38,950 --> 00:09:41,530 The short answer is they didn't pass. 220 00:09:41,530 --> 00:09:43,790 No organization received an adverse opinion 221 00:09:43,790 --> 00:09:45,380 which is the lowest level. 222 00:09:45,380 --> 00:09:47,280 The auditors reported no evidence of fraud 223 00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:48,750 and provided favorable feedback 224 00:09:48,750 --> 00:09:50,920 that the Army, Navy, and Air Force 225 00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:53,263 had properly accounted for major military equipment, 226 00:09:53,263 --> 00:09:55,283 and military and civilian pay. 227 00:09:56,370 --> 00:09:57,780 At a more detailed level though, 228 00:09:57,780 --> 00:10:02,010 the auditors identified over 2300 findings. 229 00:10:02,010 --> 00:10:03,610 What they call notice of findings 230 00:10:03,610 --> 00:10:05,890 and recommendations, or NFRs. 231 00:10:05,890 --> 00:10:07,230 And the department has developed 232 00:10:07,230 --> 00:10:09,690 corrective action plans to address 91% 233 00:10:09,690 --> 00:10:13,260 of them as of May 13th 2019. 234 00:10:13,260 --> 00:10:15,450 To give you an example of the types of findings, 235 00:10:15,450 --> 00:10:17,146 and I'll stay with the real property example 236 00:10:17,146 --> 00:10:20,040 the auditors pulled a sample of real property assets 237 00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:23,450 for the Navy and found that about 6.5% of them, 238 00:10:23,450 --> 00:10:26,620 or about 2000 items no longer existed. 239 00:10:26,620 --> 00:10:28,300 The building had been knocked down and removed, 240 00:10:28,300 --> 00:10:30,180 the property or structure had taken away, 241 00:10:30,180 --> 00:10:32,860 but it had never come out of the property system. 242 00:10:32,860 --> 00:10:35,270 In contrast the Army had very few errors 243 00:10:35,270 --> 00:10:37,770 on the existence, their buildings were there. 244 00:10:37,770 --> 00:10:39,070 But a number of the things they had 245 00:10:39,070 --> 00:10:40,210 in their facilities were listed 246 00:10:40,210 --> 00:10:41,910 as being in usable condition, 247 00:10:41,910 --> 00:10:44,200 and from the auditor's perspective they weren't, 248 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:46,230 and they ought to have been knocked down. 249 00:10:46,230 --> 00:10:48,500 Identifying these problems is not 250 00:10:48,500 --> 00:10:51,300 a step backwards, but a step forwards. 251 00:10:51,300 --> 00:10:53,170 The very purpose of the audit was to find 252 00:10:53,170 --> 00:10:54,920 as many problems as we could 253 00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:56,850 so we could start to fix them. 254 00:10:56,850 --> 00:10:58,260 And our database of findings 255 00:10:58,260 --> 00:11:00,510 has already proved tremendously valuable. 256 00:11:00,510 --> 00:11:01,870 It has allowed us to track 257 00:11:01,870 --> 00:11:04,170 our progress resolving these issues. 258 00:11:04,170 --> 00:11:05,510 For the first time the department 259 00:11:05,510 --> 00:11:08,320 has tools for oversight and accountability, 260 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:09,680 and the opportunity to leverage 261 00:11:09,680 --> 00:11:13,670 this information using modern data analytics. 262 00:11:13,670 --> 00:11:14,930 I would like to close by thanking 263 00:11:14,930 --> 00:11:16,700 the President, Secretary Shanahan, 264 00:11:16,700 --> 00:11:18,080 and the Inspector General for their 265 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:20,720 unfailing support and partnership. 266 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,260 This audit is not about compliance. 267 00:11:23,260 --> 00:11:25,750 It is about protecting taxpayer dollars. 268 00:11:25,750 --> 00:11:27,330 And we are fully committed to making 269 00:11:27,330 --> 00:11:29,410 annual financial statement audits 270 00:11:29,410 --> 00:11:32,330 the new normal at the Department of Defense. 271 00:11:32,330 --> 00:11:34,710 Finally to Congress and this committee, 272 00:11:34,710 --> 00:11:38,490 both members and in particularly your staff, thank you. 273 00:11:38,490 --> 00:11:40,530 Not only have you worked with us closely throughout, 274 00:11:40,530 --> 00:11:41,540 but you have been a key part 275 00:11:41,540 --> 00:11:43,620 of the force in getting us here. 276 00:11:43,620 --> 00:11:45,270 We appreciate the support and we will 277 00:11:45,270 --> 00:11:46,903 need your sustained attention as we move 278 00:11:46,903 --> 00:11:50,990 forward with the fiscal 2019 year audit and beyond. 279 00:11:50,990 --> 00:11:52,710 Thank you Mr. Chairman. 280 00:11:52,710 --> 00:11:53,599 - Thank you very much. 281 00:11:53,599 --> 00:11:55,070 And I understand the other witnesses are here to answer 282 00:11:55,070 --> 00:11:57,603 questions but do not have opening statements. 283 00:11:58,550 --> 00:12:02,320 I agree with a couple things that the Ranking Member said. 284 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:03,363 First of all it's important to understand 285 00:12:03,363 --> 00:12:06,220 that the full audit does not eliminate waste, 286 00:12:06,220 --> 00:12:09,421 does not guarantee efficiency, 287 00:12:09,421 --> 00:12:11,090 and make sure the whole problem gets fixed. 288 00:12:11,090 --> 00:12:12,680 And there are issues even if you know 289 00:12:12,680 --> 00:12:14,697 where you're spending your money is in the right place. 290 00:12:14,697 --> 00:12:16,930 And that's a separate and broader discussion. 291 00:12:16,930 --> 00:12:19,750 And once we get into acquisition reform, 292 00:12:19,750 --> 00:12:23,130 which I know Mr. Thornberry's done a ton of work on as well, 293 00:12:23,130 --> 00:12:26,091 that gets to those questions as well. 294 00:12:26,091 --> 00:12:29,690 And also there has been an effort made 295 00:12:29,690 --> 00:12:31,490 to get a better understanding of it. 296 00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:35,140 But within the audit world, 297 00:12:35,140 --> 00:12:38,440 if we had a full audit, if we continue forward 298 00:12:38,440 --> 00:12:42,200 on the path that we're on and get to a better place, 299 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:44,410 what is the real advantage of that? 300 00:12:44,410 --> 00:12:48,030 Can you tell us how potentially does it save you money? 301 00:12:48,030 --> 00:12:50,940 Does it give you the ability to spend money better? 302 00:12:50,940 --> 00:12:52,940 How does having a greater understanding 303 00:12:52,940 --> 00:12:55,150 of what your assets and liabilities are, 304 00:12:55,150 --> 00:12:57,830 where the money goes, and where it's coming from, 305 00:12:57,830 --> 00:12:59,059 what are the two or three things you'd say, 306 00:12:59,059 --> 00:13:00,610 this is gonna enable us to do 307 00:13:00,610 --> 00:13:02,930 this better, more efficiently. 308 00:13:02,930 --> 00:13:03,763 - Mr. Chairman I think there 309 00:13:03,763 --> 00:13:05,279 are three things that stand out. 310 00:13:05,279 --> 00:13:08,950 The first one is the better data 311 00:13:08,950 --> 00:13:10,810 to inform better decision making. 312 00:13:10,810 --> 00:13:13,940 And part of this is if you don't trust 313 00:13:13,940 --> 00:13:15,620 the accuracy of your data it's hard 314 00:13:15,620 --> 00:13:17,830 for people to rely on it and use it. 315 00:13:17,830 --> 00:13:19,180 As we've gone through the audit, 316 00:13:19,180 --> 00:13:21,230 to comply with it you have to get 317 00:13:21,230 --> 00:13:23,090 transaction level information. 318 00:13:23,090 --> 00:13:24,300 You can't just bundle them as you 319 00:13:24,300 --> 00:13:25,133 run them through the system, 320 00:13:25,133 --> 00:13:28,130 which means you can do much more sophisticated analysis. 321 00:13:28,130 --> 00:13:30,570 You can look, and I'll just use a budget example. 322 00:13:30,570 --> 00:13:33,750 Money that was obligated in the last week of the fiscal year 323 00:13:33,750 --> 00:13:36,300 that was then de-obligated two weeks later. 324 00:13:36,300 --> 00:13:38,210 Well that's not a real transaction. 325 00:13:38,210 --> 00:13:39,470 That's somebody gaming the system. 326 00:13:39,470 --> 00:13:41,030 You can find things like that. 327 00:13:41,030 --> 00:13:41,950 Which you can do the same thing 328 00:13:41,950 --> 00:13:44,690 for analysis with trends, cost or payments for items. 329 00:13:44,690 --> 00:13:48,070 So the ability for us to make sophisticated analysis, 330 00:13:48,070 --> 00:13:49,990 square footage of property, the analysis 331 00:13:49,990 --> 00:13:53,130 of the usage of them goes up dramatically. 332 00:13:53,130 --> 00:13:55,130 The other part is is drives reform. 333 00:13:55,130 --> 00:13:57,280 Many of the errors in the process 334 00:13:57,280 --> 00:13:59,090 comes from inefficiencies in the system. 335 00:13:59,090 --> 00:14:00,160 A place where somebody's doing manual 336 00:14:00,160 --> 00:14:02,410 data entry of information that had been 337 00:14:02,410 --> 00:14:04,840 previously entered in another system. 338 00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:06,850 In order to pass the audit you've gotta remove that. 339 00:14:06,850 --> 00:14:08,640 You've gotta have the clean data flow through it. 340 00:14:08,640 --> 00:14:10,600 Well you've reduced that chance for error. 341 00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:12,340 But you've also reduced the cost. 342 00:14:12,340 --> 00:14:14,750 And as the Navy's reduced its bill to DFAS 343 00:14:14,750 --> 00:14:16,930 when it switched from passing information 344 00:14:16,930 --> 00:14:18,730 that needed to be manual entered to automated, 345 00:14:18,730 --> 00:14:20,570 that saved 65 million dollars. 346 00:14:20,570 --> 00:14:23,080 Those types of things become permanent savings 347 00:14:23,080 --> 00:14:24,170 because you're never gonna back 348 00:14:24,170 --> 00:14:26,490 and remake that as a manual process. 349 00:14:26,490 --> 00:14:28,870 And I think the final piece is transparency. 350 00:14:28,870 --> 00:14:30,730 This is the ability to answer the questions 351 00:14:30,730 --> 00:14:32,240 of Congress and others at a greater 352 00:14:32,240 --> 00:14:35,100 level of detail about where we stand on inventory, 353 00:14:35,100 --> 00:14:36,210 where we have other things. 354 00:14:36,210 --> 00:14:39,520 And the confidence that comes with making decisions 355 00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:42,226 when you have that extra transparency. 356 00:14:42,226 --> 00:14:43,640 - All right so then final question, 357 00:14:43,640 --> 00:14:46,160 as I said in my opening statement, what's the next step? 358 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:48,430 What's the next most important thing that you need to do, 359 00:14:48,430 --> 00:14:51,160 or that we need to do in terms of instructing this process. 360 00:14:51,160 --> 00:14:52,690 - Sure so the next step in the process, 361 00:14:52,690 --> 00:14:54,250 is we've already started the next audit. 362 00:14:54,250 --> 00:14:56,933 So as we complete corrective action plans 363 00:14:56,933 --> 00:14:59,400 for the things that the auditors have found 364 00:14:59,400 --> 00:15:01,110 a new audit team's gonna come behind. 365 00:15:01,110 --> 00:15:03,000 And as those, whatever's been completed 366 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,440 by say June or so of this year, they will retest. 367 00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:07,230 And so we'll see if we've fixed them. 368 00:15:07,230 --> 00:15:10,130 We're particularly prioritizing inventory, 369 00:15:10,130 --> 00:15:12,233 real property, and IT, those are some of the areas 370 00:15:12,233 --> 00:15:15,880 where the most direct benefit to the war fighter is seen, 371 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:18,120 the most immediate benefit to the department. 372 00:15:18,120 --> 00:15:19,680 And it's the existence and completeness. 373 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:21,790 We'll get to the property, the evaluation, 374 00:15:21,790 --> 00:15:24,608 but the existence and completeness is a near priority. 375 00:15:24,608 --> 00:15:27,080 We'll work through those and we'll keep marching through. 376 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:28,700 Again when the auditors complete their audit 377 00:15:28,700 --> 00:15:29,896 they'll find another batch of things. 378 00:15:29,896 --> 00:15:32,190 Each of the services will prioritize. 379 00:15:32,190 --> 00:15:34,700 But we're gonna keep moving, solving those problems 380 00:15:34,700 --> 00:15:35,790 that have the immediate benefit 381 00:15:35,790 --> 00:15:38,026 to the taxpayer and the war fighter first. 382 00:15:38,026 --> 00:15:41,550 And we'll be able to show you for each of those findings, 383 00:15:41,550 --> 00:15:44,330 who was responsible, when they thought it was closed, 384 00:15:44,330 --> 00:15:46,540 whether the auditor validated it as closed, 385 00:15:46,540 --> 00:15:48,820 and which of the areas that remain as problems. 386 00:15:48,820 --> 00:15:50,510 And I think on of the challenges for Congress 387 00:15:50,510 --> 00:15:52,840 has been during all the years of audit readiness, 388 00:15:52,840 --> 00:15:54,822 is you couldn't show the Congress the progress. 389 00:15:54,822 --> 00:15:56,800 You couldn't show them where we were stuck, 390 00:15:56,800 --> 00:15:58,040 and where we're going forward. 391 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,160 And the database we have now, based on this, 392 00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:02,370 and with the auditor's independent evaluation 393 00:16:02,370 --> 00:16:04,870 will allow us to move forward in that area. 394 00:16:04,870 --> 00:16:06,540 - And I would think overall it would make 395 00:16:06,540 --> 00:16:09,490 our systems more secure as well, 396 00:16:09,490 --> 00:16:12,550 as we better understand what IT systems we have, 397 00:16:12,550 --> 00:16:14,250 what's in there, we clean them up. 398 00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:17,290 We have a better idea of what it is we're trying 399 00:16:17,290 --> 00:16:19,660 to protect and are better able to protect it. 400 00:16:19,660 --> 00:16:22,410 - Absolutely, there's a series of audit standards 401 00:16:22,410 --> 00:16:25,270 for IT systems and security that the Congress has passed. 402 00:16:25,270 --> 00:16:27,680 People know them under the acronym FISCM and FISMA. 403 00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:28,980 The auditors go through that. 404 00:16:28,980 --> 00:16:31,500 So as the Ranking Member pointed out, 405 00:16:31,500 --> 00:16:33,500 a significant percentage of our findings 406 00:16:33,500 --> 00:16:35,740 were around vulnerabilities to the security 407 00:16:35,740 --> 00:16:36,860 of those business systems. 408 00:16:36,860 --> 00:16:39,520 And that's gonna be a major area of focus. 409 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:42,672 Particularly in the CIO, we'll disclose those findings. 410 00:16:42,672 --> 00:16:43,505 - All right thank you very much. 411 00:16:43,505 --> 00:16:44,338 Mr. Thornberry. 412 00:16:46,530 --> 00:16:48,520 - As I understand it Mr. Norquist, 413 00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:53,020 so after this year's audit there well may 414 00:16:53,020 --> 00:16:56,180 be some new findings that emerge. 415 00:16:56,180 --> 00:16:59,717 In other words the findings from 2018 416 00:16:59,717 --> 00:17:03,610 are not the total universe that there will ever be 417 00:17:03,610 --> 00:17:05,450 of things that we need to improve. 418 00:17:05,450 --> 00:17:06,283 Have I got that right? 419 00:17:06,283 --> 00:17:07,580 - Absolutely. 420 00:17:07,580 --> 00:17:10,420 - And so what you do with an audit, 421 00:17:10,420 --> 00:17:12,661 and I've learned all this from Conaway of course. 422 00:17:12,661 --> 00:17:16,150 What you do with an audit is you go and take samples 423 00:17:16,150 --> 00:17:19,770 of various things and then when you have problems, 424 00:17:19,770 --> 00:17:22,770 that becomes the finding, and then you can go fix it. 425 00:17:22,770 --> 00:17:25,340 - Correct, and in some cases by fixing the first level, 426 00:17:25,340 --> 00:17:27,410 the auditors were able to go further. 427 00:17:27,410 --> 00:17:29,840 And that uncovered new areas they couldn't see before. 428 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:31,620 All of this is useful and helpful. 429 00:17:31,620 --> 00:17:33,700 It just will take time to uncover them all. 430 00:17:33,700 --> 00:17:35,860 - Okay, the only other question I've got is, 431 00:17:35,860 --> 00:17:40,370 is as I recall you helped get, 432 00:17:40,370 --> 00:17:42,500 and you were in the comptroller position 433 00:17:42,500 --> 00:17:44,580 when the Department of Homeland Security 434 00:17:44,580 --> 00:17:48,290 got to a clean audit, can you just reflect 435 00:17:48,290 --> 00:17:50,260 a little bit on that experience. 436 00:17:50,260 --> 00:17:53,730 And the challenges at DOD versus Homeland Security. 437 00:17:53,730 --> 00:17:56,821 What it takes to get from here to there. 438 00:17:56,821 --> 00:18:00,070 And I don't even know if there is possible with DOD. 439 00:18:00,070 --> 00:18:02,080 But can you just, based on your experience 440 00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:04,360 in getting a clean audit at Homeland Security, 441 00:18:04,360 --> 00:18:09,040 reflect on it, what on that for DOD. 442 00:18:09,040 --> 00:18:11,370 - So the beginning of the audit at Homeland Security 443 00:18:11,370 --> 00:18:13,720 which looked much like the beginning at DOD. 444 00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:15,940 There was a discussion of whether it was a good idea. 445 00:18:15,940 --> 00:18:17,190 There was a discussion of whether you could 446 00:18:17,190 --> 00:18:19,890 ever possibly get to a clean opinion. 447 00:18:19,890 --> 00:18:21,820 The difference was homeland security didn't have a choice. 448 00:18:21,820 --> 00:18:23,880 The audit was mandated the moment it was created. 449 00:18:23,880 --> 00:18:26,550 So it started with an annual audit 450 00:18:26,550 --> 00:18:28,590 whether it was ready for it or not. 451 00:18:28,590 --> 00:18:30,730 The processes that we put in place there 452 00:18:30,730 --> 00:18:32,690 are the ones that we've adopted here. 453 00:18:32,690 --> 00:18:34,910 The first is, you need the auditors 454 00:18:34,910 --> 00:18:36,870 to provide you detailed level findings. 455 00:18:36,870 --> 00:18:38,940 You know a normal commercial auditor 456 00:18:38,940 --> 00:18:42,060 will simply tell you, you have not passed and stop. 457 00:18:42,060 --> 00:18:43,780 We've worked with the IG to make sure 458 00:18:43,780 --> 00:18:45,300 that no matter whether we were gonna pass or not, 459 00:18:45,300 --> 00:18:48,660 the auditor keeps going, find as many things as possible. 460 00:18:48,660 --> 00:18:50,816 We have the auditor load those things into the database 461 00:18:50,816 --> 00:18:53,430 so we don't waste time with self assessments. 462 00:18:53,430 --> 00:18:54,610 I'm really not interested in whether 463 00:18:54,610 --> 00:18:56,380 somebody thinks they're in a good place. 464 00:18:56,380 --> 00:18:57,537 I'm interested in them fixing the problem, 465 00:18:57,537 --> 00:19:00,180 and whether the auditor agrees. 466 00:19:00,180 --> 00:19:03,010 The lessons we learned from that DHS experiences, 467 00:19:03,010 --> 00:19:04,930 breaking the audit into pieces. 468 00:19:04,930 --> 00:19:07,610 So at DHS it wasn't simply whether the department passed, 469 00:19:07,610 --> 00:19:10,300 Customs and Border protection, ICE, FEMA, 470 00:19:10,300 --> 00:19:13,450 Coast Guard, each were evaluated in a stand alone way. 471 00:19:13,450 --> 00:19:15,850 Much as each of the services are evaluated. 472 00:19:15,850 --> 00:19:17,930 So the department could see the progress 473 00:19:17,930 --> 00:19:20,000 and could explain it to the Congress. 474 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:21,740 Now the truth is, it took 10 years. 475 00:19:21,740 --> 00:19:24,170 I mean I wasn't even at DHS when they completed. 476 00:19:24,170 --> 00:19:25,960 But the individuals who were there 477 00:19:25,960 --> 00:19:28,170 when I was there and carried on saw it. 478 00:19:28,170 --> 00:19:29,980 And so one of the things that's very important to me 479 00:19:29,980 --> 00:19:32,640 is you have a process that's not personality 480 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:34,660 dependent that will keep going. 481 00:19:34,660 --> 00:19:36,190 You know this one crossed administrations. 482 00:19:36,190 --> 00:19:38,630 This is a very bipartisan process. 483 00:19:38,630 --> 00:19:40,710 You know Tom Hark who was there at the Coast Guard, 484 00:19:40,710 --> 00:19:43,030 helping them get across the finish line. 485 00:19:43,030 --> 00:19:45,780 But the lessons from there are directly relevant to DOD. 486 00:19:45,780 --> 00:19:47,130 And I think they've been very valuable 487 00:19:47,130 --> 00:19:49,615 in making sure we get the best start on our efforts. 488 00:19:49,615 --> 00:19:51,061 - Thank you, yield back. 489 00:19:51,061 --> 00:19:53,772 - [Mr. Chairman] Mr. Gallego. 490 00:19:53,772 --> 00:19:54,663 - Thank you Mr. Chair. 491 00:19:54,663 --> 00:19:57,273 I yield my time to Miss Slotkin from Michigan. 492 00:19:58,180 --> 00:19:59,013 - Thanks. 493 00:19:59,013 --> 00:20:00,240 Thanks for being here everyone. 494 00:20:02,220 --> 00:20:06,190 Mr. Norquist in 2018, first of all I should just say, 495 00:20:06,190 --> 00:20:09,440 I think most of us here really want to be able to go home 496 00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:12,000 to our districts and say with a straight face, 497 00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:14,940 the Department of Defense needs the resources 498 00:20:14,940 --> 00:20:17,300 that it needs, and it's accounting is in place. 499 00:20:17,300 --> 00:20:19,720 And therefore when they say they need something, 500 00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:21,540 there's not waste going on. 501 00:20:21,540 --> 00:20:22,683 So I think we're all in the same place 502 00:20:22,683 --> 00:20:25,150 in that we want the same thing. 503 00:20:25,150 --> 00:20:26,696 And it is hard for some of us to go home 504 00:20:26,696 --> 00:20:29,232 and justify increases in spending 505 00:20:29,232 --> 00:20:31,500 when every business in my district, 506 00:20:31,500 --> 00:20:32,490 you have to pass an audit. 507 00:20:32,490 --> 00:20:36,600 Right, every home budget has to account for itself. 508 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:40,050 So I think we're all coming from a positive place on this. 509 00:20:40,050 --> 00:20:42,740 Mr. Norquist in 2018 you said it might take DOD 510 00:20:42,740 --> 00:20:46,291 10 years to successfully pass an audit. 511 00:20:46,291 --> 00:20:48,740 I know we've had the six organizations 512 00:20:48,740 --> 00:20:53,450 that have passed based on us being kind of a year ahead now, 513 00:20:53,450 --> 00:20:54,748 what's your anticipated timeline for the record 514 00:20:54,748 --> 00:20:58,180 in completing a true, complete audit? 515 00:20:58,180 --> 00:20:59,610 - So for the department as a whole, 516 00:20:59,610 --> 00:21:02,610 and the 10 year experience really came out of the DHS case. 517 00:21:02,610 --> 00:21:04,660 The department as a whole doesn't get a clean opinion 518 00:21:04,660 --> 00:21:06,740 until each of the 24 elements does. 519 00:21:06,740 --> 00:21:08,370 So lemme first turn to each of the services 520 00:21:08,370 --> 00:21:10,063 and let them tell you where they believe they are. 521 00:21:10,063 --> 00:21:11,660 And their time because the department 522 00:21:11,660 --> 00:21:12,850 is gonna be when they are done. 523 00:21:12,850 --> 00:21:15,330 - And just for the sake of time if it could be pretty brief. 524 00:21:15,330 --> 00:21:16,163 Thanks guys. 525 00:21:17,600 --> 00:21:19,550 - We, the Army, we have put forward dates. 526 00:21:19,550 --> 00:21:24,550 Secretary Esper testified here that our goal is FY21 527 00:21:24,740 --> 00:21:27,230 for a modified opinion on the Army Working Capital Fund. 528 00:21:27,230 --> 00:21:31,303 And FY22 for a modified opinion on the general fund. 529 00:21:32,377 --> 00:21:34,720 It's a very uncertain science. 530 00:21:34,720 --> 00:21:39,380 So we caveat those dates with the fact that these are goals. 531 00:21:39,380 --> 00:21:40,213 - Great. 532 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:42,633 - Good morning. 533 00:21:42,633 --> 00:21:44,570 For the Navy we're looking at a five to seven year window 534 00:21:44,570 --> 00:21:46,150 for getting to a clean opinion across 535 00:21:46,150 --> 00:21:47,746 all of our financial statements. 536 00:21:47,746 --> 00:21:50,210 A lot of that's dependent on system improvements 537 00:21:50,210 --> 00:21:51,673 we're making and then also changes 538 00:21:51,673 --> 00:21:53,800 in the standardization of business processes 539 00:21:53,800 --> 00:21:55,767 so that we can have everybody doing things the same way. 540 00:21:55,767 --> 00:21:57,460 And then decrease a lot of the manual 541 00:21:57,460 --> 00:21:59,060 transactions that are occurring. 542 00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:04,350 - The Air Force is actually in a similar place as the Navy. 543 00:22:04,350 --> 00:22:06,300 And we have some experience, for example, 544 00:22:06,300 --> 00:22:07,680 through our intelligence programs. 545 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:09,030 The National Reconnaissance Office 546 00:22:09,030 --> 00:22:10,290 actually has a clean opinion. 547 00:22:10,290 --> 00:22:12,513 It took them nine years for them to get 548 00:22:12,513 --> 00:22:15,620 to their clean opinion as well. 549 00:22:15,620 --> 00:22:17,690 So we would say also that we would give 550 00:22:17,690 --> 00:22:20,160 a range pf four to five to six years 551 00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,800 at the optimistic side to get there as well. 552 00:22:23,800 --> 00:22:25,580 - Okay, and can you give me a sense 553 00:22:25,580 --> 00:22:27,740 Mr. Norquist of the sense of savings 554 00:22:27,740 --> 00:22:30,520 that was borne out just by the sort of first round 555 00:22:30,520 --> 00:22:32,210 of audit, give me a couple of highlights 556 00:22:32,210 --> 00:22:34,420 that I can explain to people back home. 557 00:22:34,420 --> 00:22:35,253 - Sure. 558 00:22:35,253 --> 00:22:36,086 So the first one I'd highlight 559 00:22:36,086 --> 00:22:37,350 is when you looked at inventory. 560 00:22:37,350 --> 00:22:38,427 And I'll use a Navy example. 561 00:22:38,427 --> 00:22:41,442 And if anyone wants to dive deeper, Tom can talk to it. 562 00:22:41,442 --> 00:22:44,650 They looked at inventory, and they found places 563 00:22:44,650 --> 00:22:46,400 where there was inventory that had been purchased 564 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:47,770 but not put in their property system. 565 00:22:47,770 --> 00:22:50,460 Which means those trying to fill orders couldn't see it. 566 00:22:50,460 --> 00:22:52,680 And they found 73 million dollars worth 567 00:22:52,680 --> 00:22:55,820 of inventory that was reusable put back into their system 568 00:22:55,820 --> 00:22:58,020 that became available to the war fighter. 569 00:22:58,020 --> 00:23:00,480 Another example, Hill Air Force Base, 570 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:02,410 the auditors don't just look at the existence, 571 00:23:02,410 --> 00:23:04,373 but there were missile motors that, 572 00:23:06,120 --> 00:23:08,360 I this it's about 71 missile motors 573 00:23:08,360 --> 00:23:10,900 worth 53 million dollars, in the database 574 00:23:10,900 --> 00:23:12,290 they said they were unserviceable, 575 00:23:12,290 --> 00:23:13,650 couldn't use the motors. 576 00:23:13,650 --> 00:23:15,630 Auditors went out and checked the motors. 577 00:23:15,630 --> 00:23:16,910 They actually were in working condition. 578 00:23:16,910 --> 00:23:18,830 So you can get those back in the system. 579 00:23:18,830 --> 00:23:21,730 That's another 53 million that we didn't have to order. 580 00:23:21,730 --> 00:23:24,810 And so this is why the accuracy and the integrity 581 00:23:24,810 --> 00:23:26,550 of the inventory system is so important. 582 00:23:26,550 --> 00:23:28,740 The completeness of it, and the accuracy of it. 583 00:23:28,740 --> 00:23:31,500 It saves you money in making sure you have access. 584 00:23:31,500 --> 00:23:32,910 It also supports the war fighter, 585 00:23:32,910 --> 00:23:34,050 that he's not waiting for a part 586 00:23:34,050 --> 00:23:35,280 that he actually could have access to. 587 00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:37,640 - Um hm, and I know we're all focused 588 00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:40,213 oftentimes on the needs of the war fighter 589 00:23:40,213 --> 00:23:44,050 in terms of hardware, but clearly it seems to me 590 00:23:44,050 --> 00:23:46,200 business management systems is a place 591 00:23:46,200 --> 00:23:48,130 where we could do some improving. 592 00:23:48,130 --> 00:23:49,340 Can you tell me your strategy 593 00:23:49,340 --> 00:23:51,970 for acquiring better business management tools, 594 00:23:51,970 --> 00:23:54,540 the way everyone at home has to do. 595 00:23:54,540 --> 00:23:57,150 - So the area we're looking for with business management 596 00:23:57,150 --> 00:23:59,570 systems is we need to make sure 597 00:23:59,570 --> 00:24:02,020 that the data in it meets the standards. 598 00:24:02,020 --> 00:24:03,900 We have for example accounting as business, 599 00:24:03,900 --> 00:24:06,210 standards of how the coding should be structured. 600 00:24:06,210 --> 00:24:08,370 So when it passes from one system to the other 601 00:24:08,370 --> 00:24:10,030 it stays all the way through. 602 00:24:10,030 --> 00:24:11,197 Some systems don't use all the data, 603 00:24:11,197 --> 00:24:12,500 and they're set up to truncate it. 604 00:24:12,500 --> 00:24:15,790 Well then you've lost the data as it flows through. 605 00:24:15,790 --> 00:24:17,400 So buying those systems in a way, 606 00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:19,240 and I think one of the provisions 607 00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:23,130 in the NDAA from last year requires us to have CPAs 608 00:24:23,130 --> 00:24:24,390 and others look at those systems, 609 00:24:24,390 --> 00:24:26,730 confirm that they will meet the standards. 610 00:24:26,730 --> 00:24:28,070 The nice thing about the audit 611 00:24:28,070 --> 00:24:31,400 is those systems get tested along the way. 612 00:24:31,400 --> 00:24:33,520 So we can see whether or not they're meeting the standards. 613 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:34,590 Not simply waiting til the end 614 00:24:34,590 --> 00:24:36,830 and saying, oh it doesn't meet our requirements. 615 00:24:36,830 --> 00:24:37,919 - Great, and then last question. 616 00:24:37,919 --> 00:24:41,020 I think obviously the training of personnel 617 00:24:41,020 --> 00:24:42,921 of dealing with this kind of skillset 618 00:24:42,921 --> 00:24:43,890 (audio skips) 619 00:24:43,890 --> 00:24:45,290 What are you gonna do differently 620 00:24:45,290 --> 00:24:47,480 to make sure we're properly training people 621 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:50,861 at the department to do this kind of financial oversight? 622 00:24:50,861 --> 00:24:51,900 - [Mr. Chairman] You'll have to answer 623 00:24:51,900 --> 00:24:52,930 that one fairly quickly. 624 00:24:52,930 --> 00:24:54,260 I'm sorry I should've pointed this out. 625 00:24:54,260 --> 00:24:55,290 We try to wrap up-- 626 00:24:55,290 --> 00:24:56,356 - Yep I got it. 627 00:24:56,356 --> 00:24:57,821 We have a very robust program and certification process 628 00:24:57,821 --> 00:25:00,730 for our financial management community. 629 00:25:00,730 --> 00:25:02,490 And OPM has often recognized it 630 00:25:02,490 --> 00:25:03,910 as one of the best practices. 631 00:25:03,910 --> 00:25:05,700 So we are very serious about the quality 632 00:25:05,700 --> 00:25:06,910 and seriousness of the training. 633 00:25:06,910 --> 00:25:07,970 And there's a lot of professional 634 00:25:07,970 --> 00:25:09,920 certifications that go along with this. 635 00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:12,160 - Thank you. 636 00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:12,993 - Mr. Turner. 637 00:25:14,131 --> 00:25:15,187 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 638 00:25:15,187 --> 00:25:19,478 Secretary Norquist, when the committee undertook 639 00:25:19,478 --> 00:25:23,350 the efforts to request audits. 640 00:25:23,350 --> 00:25:28,030 We understood that instituting these new practices 641 00:25:28,030 --> 00:25:31,700 were going to look bleak when the reports first came back. 642 00:25:31,700 --> 00:25:33,640 And that also it would be a great roadmap 643 00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:36,150 of what we need to do, and how we need 644 00:25:36,150 --> 00:25:37,952 to implement better controls. 645 00:25:37,952 --> 00:25:42,150 But absent those controls one of the concerns 646 00:25:42,150 --> 00:25:44,150 that I think that anybody's who's an advocate 647 00:25:44,150 --> 00:25:48,930 for national security, and defense spending hears 648 00:25:50,020 --> 00:25:53,289 from those who are concerned that DOD 649 00:25:53,289 --> 00:25:58,040 has problems in satisfying audit requirements 650 00:25:58,040 --> 00:26:01,070 is concerns that the money is being wasted, 651 00:26:01,070 --> 00:26:04,665 or stolen, misdirected, that is not being applied 652 00:26:04,665 --> 00:26:07,370 toward the issues of national security. 653 00:26:07,370 --> 00:26:08,651 How can you assure us that, 654 00:26:08,651 --> 00:26:11,330 we're getting ready to mark up the NDAA again 655 00:26:11,330 --> 00:26:14,880 with another large increase for the purposes 656 00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:18,940 of trying to address the issues of readiness, 657 00:26:18,940 --> 00:26:20,810 address the issues of modernization, 658 00:26:20,810 --> 00:26:22,700 look to our near peer adversaries of modernization. 659 00:26:22,700 --> 00:26:25,910 How can you assure us absent the findings 660 00:26:25,910 --> 00:26:29,917 from the auditors that everything is in place 661 00:26:29,917 --> 00:26:33,250 to be able to adequately report spending, 662 00:26:33,250 --> 00:26:35,070 that these dollars that we approve 663 00:26:35,070 --> 00:26:36,437 are actually going to our national security, 664 00:26:36,437 --> 00:26:38,770 are not being misspent, are not being redirected, 665 00:26:38,770 --> 00:26:40,780 and are not being misappropriated? 666 00:26:40,780 --> 00:26:41,693 - So this is a great question. 667 00:26:41,693 --> 00:26:43,404 I think it highlights the difference between 668 00:26:43,404 --> 00:26:45,380 the budgeting and the accounting. 669 00:26:45,380 --> 00:26:48,070 We have a very strong budget process, 670 00:26:48,070 --> 00:26:50,098 so when there's money put into a program 671 00:26:50,098 --> 00:26:55,098 for F15 or some other project, 672 00:26:55,260 --> 00:26:57,250 the Congress puts it in a particular line. 673 00:26:57,250 --> 00:26:59,560 All of our rules are designed around tracking 674 00:26:59,560 --> 00:27:01,970 those from a budgetary perspective. 675 00:27:01,970 --> 00:27:04,890 And so we know that those funds were spent on that program 676 00:27:04,890 --> 00:27:06,810 absent a reprogramming and there's some other 677 00:27:06,810 --> 00:27:08,640 notification with Congress. 678 00:27:08,640 --> 00:27:10,020 The audit just goes beyond that. 679 00:27:10,020 --> 00:27:11,820 And so you take a building under construction, 680 00:27:11,820 --> 00:27:13,300 the audits, it's fine that you spent 681 00:27:13,300 --> 00:27:14,133 the money on the building. 682 00:27:14,133 --> 00:27:16,480 The audit wants to know, where is it in construction, 683 00:27:16,480 --> 00:27:18,250 in progress, how complete it is. 684 00:27:18,250 --> 00:27:19,880 Once it's up it wants to make sure 685 00:27:19,880 --> 00:27:22,060 you know you can depreciate it, 686 00:27:22,060 --> 00:27:23,558 you know it's still unusable condition. 687 00:27:23,558 --> 00:27:26,230 So the audit takes us to a greater level. 688 00:27:26,230 --> 00:27:27,520 And the benefit of that shows up 689 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:30,400 most obviously in inventory. 690 00:27:30,400 --> 00:27:32,837 But if you look at pay, it's one of our single largest items 691 00:27:32,837 --> 00:27:37,580 the auditors didn't have findings related to those areas. 692 00:27:37,580 --> 00:27:39,581 And so when we get money in those, 693 00:27:39,581 --> 00:27:41,510 we have confidence that we're executing 694 00:27:41,510 --> 00:27:44,040 a consistent with the budget description, 695 00:27:44,040 --> 00:27:45,770 the audit just has a much higher standard 696 00:27:45,770 --> 00:27:47,820 in terms of how much further along we go. 697 00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:50,113 - Thank you Mr. Secretary. 698 00:27:50,113 --> 00:27:51,238 I yield back. 699 00:27:51,238 --> 00:27:53,750 (Chairman speaking off microphone) 700 00:27:53,750 --> 00:27:54,963 - Thank you Mr. Chair. 701 00:27:57,890 --> 00:28:00,650 I find it mind boggling that we 702 00:28:00,650 --> 00:28:02,263 haven't achieved a clean audit. 703 00:28:03,290 --> 00:28:04,710 It's one of the issues that comes up 704 00:28:04,710 --> 00:28:07,330 when I have discussions with my constituents. 705 00:28:07,330 --> 00:28:09,210 And when I go to the Chamber of Commerce, 706 00:28:09,210 --> 00:28:13,780 the Rotary, everybody just is aghast 707 00:28:13,780 --> 00:28:15,269 that we haven't been able to do this 708 00:28:15,269 --> 00:28:17,363 for the Department of Defense. 709 00:28:18,520 --> 00:28:21,450 Having come up in the ranks of the enlisted 710 00:28:21,450 --> 00:28:25,030 in the Marine Corps it's mind boggling 711 00:28:25,030 --> 00:28:27,140 that there hasn't been an accountability 712 00:28:27,140 --> 00:28:31,090 and a reprimand at the higher echelon of our DOD 713 00:28:31,090 --> 00:28:34,303 and all our branches of the military quite frankly. 714 00:28:35,380 --> 00:28:39,400 The examples you gave of failing to update 715 00:28:39,400 --> 00:28:41,923 our databases with inventory. 716 00:28:43,280 --> 00:28:45,060 Millions of dollars that possibly 717 00:28:45,060 --> 00:28:50,060 would go be at waste, is very unsettling. 718 00:28:50,650 --> 00:28:53,241 And I know you wouldn't answer the questions 719 00:28:53,241 --> 00:28:56,160 of reprimand and accountability. 720 00:28:56,160 --> 00:28:59,110 But certainly I hope that in the audit 721 00:28:59,110 --> 00:29:03,160 that there is within the DOD some kind of section 722 00:29:03,160 --> 00:29:06,670 where the higher ups understand 723 00:29:06,670 --> 00:29:10,350 what reprimand and accountability will look like 724 00:29:10,350 --> 00:29:12,310 if they continue to not implement 725 00:29:12,310 --> 00:29:15,280 the best accounting measures possible. 726 00:29:15,280 --> 00:29:18,850 Undersecretary Norquist the DODIG has indicated 727 00:29:18,850 --> 00:29:21,410 that longstanding material weaknesses 728 00:29:21,410 --> 00:29:24,240 will continue to affect DOD's ability 729 00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:26,140 to improve it's financial management, 730 00:29:26,140 --> 00:29:30,130 and ultimately accomplishing a clean audit opinion. 731 00:29:30,130 --> 00:29:31,840 What steps has the department taken 732 00:29:31,840 --> 00:29:33,854 to address some of these material weaknesses 733 00:29:33,854 --> 00:29:37,373 such as accounting for its property and equipment. 734 00:29:38,250 --> 00:29:40,550 From the list of longstanding material weaknesses 735 00:29:40,550 --> 00:29:43,610 are there specific ones the department feels 736 00:29:43,610 --> 00:29:45,793 are more urgent in terms of addressing? 737 00:29:47,060 --> 00:29:48,470 - I'd be happy to do that. 738 00:29:48,470 --> 00:29:50,160 And so I think that in terms 739 00:29:50,160 --> 00:29:53,930 of what's the most urgent, the answer is inventory, 740 00:29:53,930 --> 00:29:56,620 is the IT security, and the property. 741 00:29:56,620 --> 00:29:59,290 Those are the three that are the particular focus. 742 00:29:59,290 --> 00:30:02,560 Well of course all of them, but those are the first three. 743 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:04,683 I think if, let me have one of the services if, 744 00:30:04,683 --> 00:30:06,011 Tom do you wanna give an example 745 00:30:06,011 --> 00:30:08,083 of the steps you're taking on inventory. 746 00:30:09,623 --> 00:30:10,944 - Yes sir, thank you for the question. 747 00:30:10,944 --> 00:30:13,080 We've made a lot of progress around inventory 748 00:30:13,080 --> 00:30:15,730 where we've gone base to base 749 00:30:15,730 --> 00:30:17,220 trying to do a full complete inventory. 750 00:30:17,220 --> 00:30:19,360 This last year we did an inventory 751 00:30:19,360 --> 00:30:21,140 of the vast majority of our bases. 752 00:30:21,140 --> 00:30:23,740 We've identified areas where there's a material 753 00:30:23,740 --> 00:30:25,270 that's not recorded in the accountable 754 00:30:25,270 --> 00:30:27,270 property system of record, and we're taking steps 755 00:30:27,270 --> 00:30:29,823 to get that inventory into our record. 756 00:30:30,670 --> 00:30:33,350 In Jacksonville we found 280 million dollars worth 757 00:30:33,350 --> 00:30:35,920 of items that had been bought, purchased were not 758 00:30:35,920 --> 00:30:37,890 in our system of record and they're now are. 759 00:30:37,890 --> 00:30:41,070 We found 81 million of those have gone 760 00:30:41,070 --> 00:30:42,017 back into the system of record. 761 00:30:42,017 --> 00:30:45,640 And they're now being used to fulfill requisitions. 762 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:48,170 To date we've filled over $3,000,000 763 00:30:48,170 --> 00:30:50,460 worth of requisitions for that. 764 00:30:50,460 --> 00:30:51,700 - Thank you. 765 00:30:51,700 --> 00:30:54,381 One of the areas GAO continues to see 766 00:30:54,381 --> 00:30:57,770 as areas of improvement is DODs focus 767 00:30:57,770 --> 00:30:59,387 on centralizing its monitoring 768 00:30:59,387 --> 00:31:02,870 and reporting process by utilizing the database 769 00:31:02,870 --> 00:31:05,370 to include financial management related findings 770 00:31:05,370 --> 00:31:08,760 and recommendations, and corrective action plans 771 00:31:08,760 --> 00:31:11,330 to essentially track progress. 772 00:31:11,330 --> 00:31:14,150 Secretary Norquist is the department facing 773 00:31:14,150 --> 00:31:16,050 any specific challenges in terms 774 00:31:16,050 --> 00:31:19,890 of utilizing and populating the database more? 775 00:31:19,890 --> 00:31:21,670 - So this was a tremendous help. 776 00:31:21,670 --> 00:31:23,790 One of the lessons we took from DHS 777 00:31:23,790 --> 00:31:25,940 which is we set up an NFR tracking database. 778 00:31:25,940 --> 00:31:27,530 We worked with the IG. 779 00:31:27,530 --> 00:31:28,530 The IG was very helpful. 780 00:31:28,530 --> 00:31:30,220 They modified the contracts to require 781 00:31:30,220 --> 00:31:32,730 the auditors themselves to enter the findings. 782 00:31:32,730 --> 00:31:34,500 So when we show you we reported the findings 783 00:31:34,500 --> 00:31:36,960 it's not our view, it's the auditors view. 784 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:39,920 The system that was set up was sufficiently well done 785 00:31:39,920 --> 00:31:41,280 that although it was not mandated, 786 00:31:41,280 --> 00:31:43,010 each of the services came along and said, 787 00:31:43,010 --> 00:31:44,640 it's easier for me to use your system 788 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:46,780 to track progress, and they started loading 789 00:31:46,780 --> 00:31:48,330 all of their corrective action plans. 790 00:31:48,330 --> 00:31:50,079 So now you've got a single system that says, 791 00:31:50,079 --> 00:31:52,330 here's the auditor identified problem. 792 00:31:52,330 --> 00:31:54,150 Here's the service's corrective action 793 00:31:54,150 --> 00:31:55,590 plan with who's accountable, 794 00:31:55,590 --> 00:31:57,380 here's when it's supposed to be complete. 795 00:31:57,380 --> 00:31:59,840 And so I think what the GO and others were highlighting 796 00:31:59,840 --> 00:32:01,180 is they're very fond of that process. 797 00:32:01,180 --> 00:32:02,230 They think that works well, 798 00:32:02,230 --> 00:32:04,841 and they've encouraged us to use that. 799 00:32:04,841 --> 00:32:05,674 - Thank you. 800 00:32:05,674 --> 00:32:07,547 Mr. Chair I yield back. 801 00:32:07,547 --> 00:32:10,135 (Chairman speaking off microphone) 802 00:32:10,135 --> 00:32:10,968 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 803 00:32:10,968 --> 00:32:12,790 I yield my time to Mr. Conaway. 804 00:32:12,790 --> 00:32:13,920 - Well thank you Mr. Rogers. 805 00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:16,890 And I also appreciate the kind comments 806 00:32:16,890 --> 00:32:18,390 of the Ranking Member at the start. 807 00:32:18,390 --> 00:32:20,020 I know it was painful for him to do that. 808 00:32:20,020 --> 00:32:22,893 But I certainly appreciate the comments. 809 00:32:24,650 --> 00:32:27,860 On the property plan and equipment focus 810 00:32:27,860 --> 00:32:29,820 what benefit would be if at some point 811 00:32:29,820 --> 00:32:31,410 in time in the future we'll need to evaluate 812 00:32:31,410 --> 00:32:33,160 whether or not we've got excess capacity 813 00:32:33,160 --> 00:32:34,070 at all the bases around. 814 00:32:34,070 --> 00:32:36,510 We typically call it a BRAC, those kind of things. 815 00:32:36,510 --> 00:32:39,570 To start that the base document would be those records 816 00:32:39,570 --> 00:32:41,770 that you're going through right now 817 00:32:41,770 --> 00:32:43,574 so that it's, the decision makers had, 818 00:32:43,574 --> 00:32:45,690 we're looking at records that had buildings 819 00:32:45,690 --> 00:32:48,210 that didn't exist, or had buildings that were, 820 00:32:48,210 --> 00:32:50,410 did exist but weren't on there. 821 00:32:50,410 --> 00:32:51,823 The decision would be less, 822 00:32:53,490 --> 00:32:55,930 it wouldn't be as good as if those records are there. 823 00:32:55,930 --> 00:32:57,730 So the importance of having these records 824 00:32:57,730 --> 00:33:00,630 is really important as you go about making your decisions. 825 00:33:01,740 --> 00:33:03,150 Mr. Norquist this time next year, 826 00:33:03,150 --> 00:33:04,330 we'll have hopefully the Chairman 827 00:33:04,330 --> 00:33:05,980 will have another hearing like this where we'll ask 828 00:33:05,980 --> 00:33:08,510 you to perhaps bring in the report card, 829 00:33:08,510 --> 00:33:11,700 or the NFR work that's moving from 18 to 19 and forward. 830 00:33:11,700 --> 00:33:13,291 And we'll be able to see that progress 831 00:33:13,291 --> 00:33:15,310 and help us understand that. 832 00:33:15,310 --> 00:33:16,600 In the meantime though it'd be helpful 833 00:33:16,600 --> 00:33:20,950 for the team to know markets of success. 834 00:33:20,950 --> 00:33:22,890 You've talked a couple of anecdotal pieces 835 00:33:22,890 --> 00:33:25,840 where one off money has been found to help with the system, 836 00:33:25,840 --> 00:33:27,040 those kind of things. 837 00:33:27,040 --> 00:33:29,700 What would be the reduction in audit effort 838 00:33:29,700 --> 00:33:31,760 from year to year as you got better? 839 00:33:31,760 --> 00:33:32,980 As your systems got better, 840 00:33:32,980 --> 00:33:34,120 as the accountants were able to rely 841 00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:37,764 on the systems to shrink the size of their databases. 842 00:33:37,764 --> 00:33:40,300 Can any of the three of you who've maybe 843 00:33:40,300 --> 00:33:41,530 experienced something like that 844 00:33:41,530 --> 00:33:43,350 share with us where at one year it took 845 00:33:43,350 --> 00:33:46,000 us this many audit hours, and man hours, 846 00:33:46,000 --> 00:33:47,540 the next year our systems were better 847 00:33:47,540 --> 00:33:50,250 and the auditors were able to shrink their sample size. 848 00:33:50,250 --> 00:33:52,420 Can you give us any kind of a anecdote like that 849 00:33:52,420 --> 00:33:54,910 that shows real progress on sustaining an audit 850 00:33:54,910 --> 00:33:55,870 year to year going forward. 851 00:33:55,870 --> 00:33:57,706 - I think Congressman the best example 852 00:33:57,706 --> 00:33:59,190 is the Army Corp of Engineers. 853 00:33:59,190 --> 00:34:01,250 I'll let John Whitley talk to it. 854 00:34:01,250 --> 00:34:02,950 But the Corp of Engineers has a clean opinion. 855 00:34:02,950 --> 00:34:04,390 But they've gone through this process 856 00:34:04,390 --> 00:34:06,420 from beginning to end, so John. 857 00:34:06,420 --> 00:34:08,078 - Yes sir, the Corp of Engineers 858 00:34:08,078 --> 00:34:11,260 did see significant changes as they got 859 00:34:11,260 --> 00:34:13,150 into the modified and then a clean opinion. 860 00:34:13,150 --> 00:34:15,180 So they've got a clean opinion for about 11 years. 861 00:34:15,180 --> 00:34:17,190 Over that period of time they went 862 00:34:17,190 --> 00:34:20,730 from about 150 auditors down to 35. 863 00:34:20,730 --> 00:34:22,519 Sample sizes, we've talked already about 864 00:34:22,519 --> 00:34:24,070 going in and taking samples. 865 00:34:24,070 --> 00:34:25,630 Those sample sizes declined from about 866 00:34:25,630 --> 00:34:28,630 14,000 down to about 2000. 867 00:34:28,630 --> 00:34:32,720 And the cost of the audit, the cost for the auditors 868 00:34:32,720 --> 00:34:34,670 fell, cut in half from about 10 million 869 00:34:34,670 --> 00:34:36,180 to 5,000,000 during that period. 870 00:34:36,180 --> 00:34:37,610 - So hopefully this time next year 871 00:34:37,610 --> 00:34:38,790 you'll see additional progress. 872 00:34:38,790 --> 00:34:41,950 You can help the committee understand that's real progress. 873 00:34:41,950 --> 00:34:44,320 Because while a clean audit for the whole thing 874 00:34:44,320 --> 00:34:47,160 is part of a longer journey, 875 00:34:47,160 --> 00:34:49,150 year in year out you're gonna have to provide us 876 00:34:49,150 --> 00:34:51,600 with audited financial statements and those kind of things. 877 00:34:51,600 --> 00:34:54,330 Part of the problems early on were the variety 878 00:34:54,330 --> 00:34:56,110 of Legacy systems that you were trying to cope with. 879 00:34:56,110 --> 00:34:58,250 Where you were converting from manual 880 00:34:58,250 --> 00:35:00,050 to electronic and everything else. 881 00:35:00,050 --> 00:35:02,470 Any sense on how many Legacy systems 882 00:35:02,470 --> 00:35:06,320 are still being maintained, and that you still rely on. 883 00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:07,468 I know you're trying to get away from 'em. 884 00:35:07,468 --> 00:35:08,301 But could you give us a sense 885 00:35:08,301 --> 00:35:10,600 on the reduction in those Legacy systems. 886 00:35:10,600 --> 00:35:13,850 - So we have about 294 significant business systems, 887 00:35:13,850 --> 00:35:14,870 which is the largest set. 888 00:35:14,870 --> 00:35:17,210 Not all of them under DOD's control. 889 00:35:17,210 --> 00:35:18,240 I'll use one example. 890 00:35:18,240 --> 00:35:19,330 And the services can probably 891 00:35:19,330 --> 00:35:21,280 just talk to their accounting systems. 892 00:35:21,280 --> 00:35:22,878 Defense Agency, we used to have seven different systems 893 00:35:22,878 --> 00:35:25,420 supporting 22 different Defense Agencies. 894 00:35:25,420 --> 00:35:28,110 Those have all come down to one system called DAI. 895 00:35:28,110 --> 00:35:30,230 And that's a huge improvement for us. 896 00:35:30,230 --> 00:35:31,780 And I don't know if, maybe the Air Force 897 00:35:31,780 --> 00:35:34,680 wants to talk about their efforts on system consolidation. 898 00:35:35,740 --> 00:35:38,110 - Very similar, I'll use as an example. 899 00:35:38,110 --> 00:35:40,480 Okay as we, we're actually pretty pleased 900 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:41,980 with where we are with munitions inventory. 901 00:35:41,980 --> 00:35:44,300 We're at actually 100% and all. 902 00:35:44,300 --> 00:35:46,810 We were able to sunset 10 systems 903 00:35:46,810 --> 00:35:49,730 in going to a new modernized, more up to date system. 904 00:35:49,730 --> 00:35:52,170 So that's just an example of the kind of trend 905 00:35:52,170 --> 00:35:53,420 that we're looking for in terms 906 00:35:53,420 --> 00:35:56,070 of trying to sunset as many systems as possible. 907 00:35:56,070 --> 00:35:59,960 Ultimately for example we have an accounting system 908 00:35:59,960 --> 00:36:01,830 which we deem, we call DEAMS, 909 00:36:01,830 --> 00:36:03,030 which is Defense Enterprise 910 00:36:03,030 --> 00:36:04,720 and Accounting Management System. 911 00:36:04,720 --> 00:36:08,010 Ultimately we hope to sunset a number of older systems 912 00:36:08,010 --> 00:36:09,960 and as we move to DEAMS and it becomes-- 913 00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:11,288 - So Mr. Roth tell us why getting 914 00:36:11,288 --> 00:36:13,760 rid of those systems is important going forward. 915 00:36:13,760 --> 00:36:15,700 Because someone has to remember 916 00:36:15,700 --> 00:36:17,800 how those systems were coded and maintained, 917 00:36:17,800 --> 00:36:18,633 and all those kind of things. 918 00:36:18,633 --> 00:36:20,189 Well that all goes away help us understand-- 919 00:36:20,189 --> 00:36:22,670 - As has been noted before, part of our problem 920 00:36:22,670 --> 00:36:25,370 are the aging systems, and the nature of the aging systems, 921 00:36:25,370 --> 00:36:27,270 and they take a lot of care and feeding. 922 00:36:27,270 --> 00:36:29,660 But the other problem is as data moves 923 00:36:29,660 --> 00:36:31,330 from one of these systems to the other 924 00:36:31,330 --> 00:36:34,180 is an opportunity for error at each one of those stages. 925 00:36:34,180 --> 00:36:35,840 Okay and so that is one of our 926 00:36:35,840 --> 00:36:37,380 fundamental weaknesses right now, 927 00:36:37,380 --> 00:36:40,880 one of our Achilles heels is that a lot of our data 928 00:36:40,880 --> 00:36:43,480 moves from one kind of, like an HR system 929 00:36:43,480 --> 00:36:45,620 to the financial system, from the logistics system 930 00:36:45,620 --> 00:36:48,062 to the acquisitions and those kinds of things. 931 00:36:48,062 --> 00:36:50,810 The fewer interfaces you have, 932 00:36:50,810 --> 00:36:52,420 the fewer opportunities for error 933 00:36:52,420 --> 00:36:55,290 and therefore fewer opportunities for audit findings. 934 00:36:55,290 --> 00:36:56,170 - I appreciate that. 935 00:36:56,170 --> 00:36:57,600 I would like to tell the committee 936 00:36:57,600 --> 00:36:59,570 that even in companies that have clean opinions, 937 00:36:59,570 --> 00:37:01,373 from time to time the auditors will find things 938 00:37:01,373 --> 00:37:04,090 that will posit to management 939 00:37:04,090 --> 00:37:05,340 that could be improved going forward. 940 00:37:05,340 --> 00:37:06,430 So even if we had a clean opinion 941 00:37:06,430 --> 00:37:08,890 across the entire system it would not be unexpected 942 00:37:08,890 --> 00:37:09,943 that going forward they would have 943 00:37:09,943 --> 00:37:12,310 new improvements to be made in this regard. 944 00:37:12,310 --> 00:37:13,430 This is hard work. 945 00:37:13,430 --> 00:37:14,630 You've got a lot of folks who've put 946 00:37:14,630 --> 00:37:16,028 a lot of time and effort into it. 947 00:37:16,028 --> 00:37:17,720 I appreciate that effort. 948 00:37:17,720 --> 00:37:18,553 We're all frustrated. 949 00:37:18,553 --> 00:37:20,350 You're frustrated that we're not already there. 950 00:37:20,350 --> 00:37:22,340 But I'll just, to assure my colleagues, 951 00:37:22,340 --> 00:37:26,290 as Max said I've been shepherding this for awhile. 952 00:37:26,290 --> 00:37:27,440 It's not for lack of effort. 953 00:37:27,440 --> 00:37:29,760 It's not lack of management from the top, 954 00:37:29,760 --> 00:37:31,630 tone from the top that this is not getting done. 955 00:37:31,630 --> 00:37:32,850 So it is hard. 956 00:37:32,850 --> 00:37:33,990 So I yield back. 957 00:37:33,990 --> 00:37:35,023 - Thank you very much. 958 00:37:35,023 --> 00:37:40,023 And as the Chairman said, he will be returning 959 00:37:40,200 --> 00:37:43,270 in a few minutes, and I'll go ahead and yield 960 00:37:43,270 --> 00:37:46,263 to myself for five minutes or less. 961 00:37:47,860 --> 00:37:50,710 So according to this summary from the Department 962 00:37:50,710 --> 00:37:52,560 of Defense Inspector General, 963 00:37:52,560 --> 00:37:54,970 auditors found significant control deficiencies 964 00:37:54,970 --> 00:37:57,380 regarding IT systems, and you've mentioned that, 965 00:37:57,380 --> 00:37:59,633 you've discussed some of that here today. 966 00:37:59,633 --> 00:38:04,633 There's some specific findings relating to IT systems. 967 00:38:05,300 --> 00:38:09,740 The IG also characterized financial management systems 968 00:38:09,740 --> 00:38:14,143 and information technology as the most significant weakness. 969 00:38:15,910 --> 00:38:18,420 Has these deficiencies prevented the auditors 970 00:38:18,420 --> 00:38:22,090 from assessing the financial data completely 971 00:38:23,110 --> 00:38:25,770 due to the inability to assess the integrity of the data. 972 00:38:25,770 --> 00:38:29,500 Should we expect another wave of adverse findings 973 00:38:29,500 --> 00:38:33,680 once the financial data itself is better assessed? 974 00:38:33,680 --> 00:38:35,930 - So there's ways for the auditors 975 00:38:35,930 --> 00:38:37,160 to test it but there are limits. 976 00:38:37,160 --> 00:38:39,430 So I would always expect as the auditors are able to go 977 00:38:39,430 --> 00:38:41,840 further for them to find additional challenges. 978 00:38:41,840 --> 00:38:43,810 But their concern that if you enter the data 979 00:38:43,810 --> 00:38:45,216 into the system in one location, 980 00:38:45,216 --> 00:38:49,110 does it properly manage the transaction to the other side. 981 00:38:49,110 --> 00:38:51,370 They can do that the hard way by recreating 982 00:38:51,370 --> 00:38:53,460 the process themselves, but the more they can rely 983 00:38:53,460 --> 00:38:56,250 on the system the stronger and the better the process gets. 984 00:38:56,250 --> 00:39:00,380 - And when will the integrity of the IT systems 985 00:39:00,380 --> 00:39:02,460 be sufficient for a full assessment 986 00:39:02,460 --> 00:39:04,770 of the financial data that it contains? 987 00:39:04,770 --> 00:39:06,440 - Sir they will do that system by system. 988 00:39:06,440 --> 00:39:08,720 They will have certain systems where they have reviewed, 989 00:39:08,720 --> 00:39:10,490 and I think the Army has at least one 990 00:39:10,490 --> 00:39:12,190 that they have gone all the way through 991 00:39:12,190 --> 00:39:13,980 all the corrective action plans. 992 00:39:13,980 --> 00:39:15,090 Which is that Ellen? 993 00:39:15,090 --> 00:39:17,780 - [Tom] Ellen Feigal, Logistics Management Program. 994 00:39:17,780 --> 00:39:19,810 - So can you give me maybe an example 995 00:39:19,810 --> 00:39:21,910 of one that's not where it needs to be 996 00:39:21,910 --> 00:39:23,550 but will be in a short period of time. 997 00:39:23,550 --> 00:39:27,050 And then perhaps what area or what activity, 998 00:39:27,050 --> 00:39:29,726 what component is experiencing the greatest 999 00:39:29,726 --> 00:39:31,540 difficulties in this area? 1000 00:39:31,540 --> 00:39:32,910 - [Mr. Norquist] Sure, do one of the services wanna take, 1001 00:39:32,910 --> 00:39:35,283 which system do you have that you have to replace? 1002 00:39:37,873 --> 00:39:41,340 - So I would just, say just, to answer your question 1003 00:39:41,340 --> 00:39:43,350 the L&P system, it took about four years. 1004 00:39:43,350 --> 00:39:46,200 We have, that started with 29 findings. 1005 00:39:46,200 --> 00:39:47,690 Went to 22, went to 12, went to thee, 1006 00:39:47,690 --> 00:39:50,300 and then this year we have zero findings. 1007 00:39:50,300 --> 00:39:52,780 It is covered by one corporate crosscutting 1008 00:39:52,780 --> 00:39:54,500 finding on end user controls. 1009 00:39:54,500 --> 00:39:55,360 So that's an example. 1010 00:39:55,360 --> 00:39:56,530 We have our other systems. 1011 00:39:56,530 --> 00:39:58,130 Our financial management ERP, 1012 00:39:58,130 --> 00:40:00,550 and our tactical logistics ERP. 1013 00:40:00,550 --> 00:40:02,140 They're kind of at the beginning stage, 1014 00:40:02,140 --> 00:40:03,640 maybe a year or two into that process. 1015 00:40:03,640 --> 00:40:06,743 So I would predict another couple of years on those. 1016 00:40:08,380 --> 00:40:12,630 - Then one, any examples of some, couple of decades? 1017 00:40:12,630 --> 00:40:14,000 - Well I'll jump in. 1018 00:40:14,000 --> 00:40:16,030 I think it has been pretty well documented 1019 00:40:16,030 --> 00:40:17,270 over the years that the interface 1020 00:40:17,270 --> 00:40:18,880 between our pay and personnel systems 1021 00:40:18,880 --> 00:40:20,030 has always been a challenge. 1022 00:40:20,030 --> 00:40:22,190 And we tried some enterprise wide, 1023 00:40:22,190 --> 00:40:24,990 DOD wide systems that failed and these kind of things. 1024 00:40:24,990 --> 00:40:27,090 So we in the Air Force, and the reason it's a problem 1025 00:40:27,090 --> 00:40:28,190 in part 'cause it takes a lot 1026 00:40:28,190 --> 00:40:29,490 of manual effort to get it right. 1027 00:40:29,490 --> 00:40:31,350 I mean there's no two Airmen for example 1028 00:40:31,350 --> 00:40:33,000 that are paid precisely the same thing. 1029 00:40:33,000 --> 00:40:34,630 And so you have to make sure you get 1030 00:40:34,630 --> 00:40:37,200 all the data in terms of seniority, and grade, 1031 00:40:37,200 --> 00:40:39,570 and all those kinds of things got correct. 1032 00:40:39,570 --> 00:40:41,194 So the Air Force is moving to a new system, 1033 00:40:41,194 --> 00:40:44,130 AFIPPS by acronym, where we will integrate 1034 00:40:44,130 --> 00:40:45,198 the pay and personnel system. 1035 00:40:45,198 --> 00:40:49,213 And it's going to reduce the error rate well over 90%. 1036 00:40:50,079 --> 00:40:52,120 - Are some of the challenges associated 1037 00:40:52,120 --> 00:40:54,660 with the fact that many forms, 1038 00:40:54,660 --> 00:40:57,600 while the data is entered on a computer terminal, 1039 00:40:57,600 --> 00:41:01,290 that data can't, is not computable. 1040 00:41:01,290 --> 00:41:03,260 It can't be transferred digitally? 1041 00:41:03,260 --> 00:41:06,080 - So it, what happens is in some cases it's, 1042 00:41:06,080 --> 00:41:07,330 right it's entered in a form that 1043 00:41:07,330 --> 00:41:08,470 that's not easily transmitted, 1044 00:41:08,470 --> 00:41:11,252 or that system only uses five pieces of information 1045 00:41:11,252 --> 00:41:13,790 and the systems on either side of it need all eight. 1046 00:41:13,790 --> 00:41:15,550 And so you've gotta restructure that system 1047 00:41:15,550 --> 00:41:18,340 so it holds the full set of the string of data 1048 00:41:18,340 --> 00:41:21,250 and allows it to be used by both sides of the process. 1049 00:41:21,250 --> 00:41:24,861 - Would the DD214 be an example of a form. 1050 00:41:24,861 --> 00:41:26,210 - Do you know if that's on of the issues? 1051 00:41:26,210 --> 00:41:27,470 - Let me take that one for the record. 1052 00:41:27,470 --> 00:41:28,450 - Okay thank you. 1053 00:41:28,450 --> 00:41:33,450 And I will yield to Mr. Wittman for five minutes. 1054 00:41:34,160 --> 00:41:34,993 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 1055 00:41:34,993 --> 00:41:36,760 Gentlemen thanks so much for joining us today. 1056 00:41:36,760 --> 00:41:38,910 Thank you for your continual effort 1057 00:41:38,910 --> 00:41:40,470 in the realm of auditing. 1058 00:41:40,470 --> 00:41:43,490 It is not headline grabbing, but I think it 1059 00:41:43,490 --> 00:41:46,620 is fundamental to how we manage the massive amount 1060 00:41:46,620 --> 00:41:48,300 of resources that we send to the Pentagon. 1061 00:41:48,300 --> 00:41:49,770 Mr. Norquist I wanted to get you 1062 00:41:49,770 --> 00:41:51,010 to elaborate a little bit more. 1063 00:41:51,010 --> 00:41:53,084 You've talked about some of the challenges 1064 00:41:53,084 --> 00:41:56,290 within the current DOD system. 1065 00:41:56,290 --> 00:41:57,620 And we understand that there are a lot 1066 00:41:57,620 --> 00:41:59,990 of different ways in which the service branches 1067 00:41:59,990 --> 00:42:04,520 either transact business, account for expenditures. 1068 00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:06,400 It seems like to me there ought to be, 1069 00:42:06,400 --> 00:42:09,120 not only as part of getting the picture 1070 00:42:09,120 --> 00:42:11,540 clearer in the audit, that we ought to look 1071 00:42:11,540 --> 00:42:14,160 at these systems and determine are there simpler 1072 00:42:14,160 --> 00:42:15,670 and easier ways to do this. 1073 00:42:15,670 --> 00:42:17,010 You just heard the Air Force talk about 1074 00:42:17,010 --> 00:42:21,430 developing their system on the side of paying personnel. 1075 00:42:21,430 --> 00:42:22,847 Is there a way that we can look at 1076 00:42:22,847 --> 00:42:25,170 unifying these systems, shouldn't there be 1077 00:42:25,170 --> 00:42:29,030 a single system that cuts across service branches 1078 00:42:29,030 --> 00:42:32,410 and how we transact, and how we acquire, 1079 00:42:32,410 --> 00:42:34,950 how we pay personnel to make it easier 1080 00:42:34,950 --> 00:42:37,160 to go to a single place in doing the audit. 1081 00:42:37,160 --> 00:42:38,340 It seems like to me that would make 1082 00:42:38,340 --> 00:42:40,030 your job a little bit easier, 1083 00:42:40,030 --> 00:42:42,410 is to have some commonality across systems 1084 00:42:42,410 --> 00:42:44,580 either in how we account for things, 1085 00:42:44,580 --> 00:42:46,350 or just the nuts and bolts 1086 00:42:46,350 --> 00:42:48,830 about how transactions take place. 1087 00:42:48,830 --> 00:42:51,410 - Absolutely and so when we look at a process, 1088 00:42:51,410 --> 00:42:52,730 the first question we ask is can 1089 00:42:52,730 --> 00:42:55,220 we have a single system for the entire department. 1090 00:42:55,220 --> 00:42:57,580 If you can that makes everything easier. 1091 00:42:57,580 --> 00:42:59,150 There are places where we do. 1092 00:42:59,150 --> 00:43:02,270 You then drop down and say, in some cases the process 1093 00:43:02,270 --> 00:43:04,090 is sufficiently complicated, and we've seen 1094 00:43:04,090 --> 00:43:05,148 the challenges when you try and get 1095 00:43:05,148 --> 00:43:08,310 all three services onto a system where they each 1096 00:43:08,310 --> 00:43:09,930 have slightly different processes. 1097 00:43:09,930 --> 00:43:11,950 It makes it very hard for the program manager 1098 00:43:11,950 --> 00:43:14,050 to ever deliver a working system. 1099 00:43:14,050 --> 00:43:15,810 In some of those cases your answer to the question 1100 00:43:15,810 --> 00:43:18,230 is can I get them all to agree on receiving 1101 00:43:18,230 --> 00:43:20,880 and transmitting data in the same format. 1102 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:23,060 In which case I may not mind that they're different systems 1103 00:43:23,060 --> 00:43:25,380 as long as they will talk to everything else 1104 00:43:25,380 --> 00:43:26,620 the way they're supposed to. 1105 00:43:26,620 --> 00:43:28,050 And so you work your way through that. 1106 00:43:28,050 --> 00:43:30,090 Somewhere in the question is do I replace it? 1107 00:43:30,090 --> 00:43:31,400 Do I retire it? 1108 00:43:31,400 --> 00:43:32,865 In a few cases it may be simple enough 1109 00:43:32,865 --> 00:43:35,573 just to modify the system and it'll be sufficient. 1110 00:43:36,440 --> 00:43:38,680 - To what extent can you push the different 1111 00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:41,350 service branches with sometimes the inertia 1112 00:43:41,350 --> 00:43:43,820 that exists there to say this is the way we do it, 1113 00:43:43,820 --> 00:43:47,320 we can't do it another way because of particular reasons. 1114 00:43:47,320 --> 00:43:48,750 Do you look at that critically and say, 1115 00:43:48,750 --> 00:43:50,486 well these are legitimate reasons why you 1116 00:43:50,486 --> 00:43:52,430 have a unique way of doing, 1117 00:43:52,430 --> 00:43:53,820 or these are not legitimate reasons, 1118 00:43:53,820 --> 00:43:55,040 there should be a way that you can 1119 00:43:55,040 --> 00:43:57,070 do it in common with the other service branches. 1120 00:43:57,070 --> 00:43:59,774 I think in some instances being able to push the envelope, 1121 00:43:59,774 --> 00:44:02,610 push the service branches essentially past their point 1122 00:44:02,610 --> 00:44:04,688 in comfort to say this is the way we've always done it, 1123 00:44:04,688 --> 00:44:06,436 and we can't do it another way. 1124 00:44:06,436 --> 00:44:09,040 Do you think about that? 1125 00:44:09,040 --> 00:44:10,780 Do you push the issue to really make them 1126 00:44:10,780 --> 00:44:12,270 critically think about how they're doing 1127 00:44:12,270 --> 00:44:14,660 and the process by which they're doing it. 1128 00:44:14,660 --> 00:44:15,760 - We do, and that's usually one 1129 00:44:15,760 --> 00:44:17,160 of the core of the conversations. 1130 00:44:17,160 --> 00:44:21,280 Which is, is it really an unusual process 1131 00:44:21,280 --> 00:44:24,010 that you have to do, and the answer is, if it is why? 1132 00:44:24,010 --> 00:44:25,020 Is it your policy? 1133 00:44:25,020 --> 00:44:26,270 Maybe we just change the process. 1134 00:44:26,270 --> 00:44:27,320 I mean one of the things you always 1135 00:44:27,320 --> 00:44:31,360 have to be care about is automating your existing process, 1136 00:44:31,360 --> 00:44:34,780 not revising your process to take advantage of automation. 1137 00:44:34,780 --> 00:44:36,958 And so in some cases we go back and we work 1138 00:44:36,958 --> 00:44:41,000 with the service and say, that's not the best way to do it. 1139 00:44:41,000 --> 00:44:42,710 One of the other services has a better way. 1140 00:44:42,710 --> 00:44:45,330 You need to come over this direction. 1141 00:44:45,330 --> 00:44:46,590 And those are the types of challenges. 1142 00:44:46,590 --> 00:44:47,423 They're often very difficult. 1143 00:44:47,423 --> 00:44:49,470 You're really down into the technical aspects. 1144 00:44:49,470 --> 00:44:51,330 But it's an essential change if you can get it right. 1145 00:44:51,330 --> 00:44:54,290 - Sure, let me ask you of your expectations 1146 00:44:54,290 --> 00:44:58,030 about where we are today, and the path 1147 00:44:58,030 --> 00:45:01,156 that has been charted by DOD, 1148 00:45:01,156 --> 00:45:04,130 and where DOD will be in five years, 1149 00:45:04,130 --> 00:45:07,300 and 10 years related to the audit. 1150 00:45:07,300 --> 00:45:09,750 How much clearer will the audit be? 1151 00:45:09,750 --> 00:45:11,000 How will systems change? 1152 00:45:11,000 --> 00:45:13,080 And what can we expect in that five year 1153 00:45:13,080 --> 00:45:16,680 and then 10 year window as far as transparency 1154 00:45:16,680 --> 00:45:21,270 and clarity, and the result of each subsequent 1155 00:45:21,270 --> 00:45:22,910 audit through that period of time? 1156 00:45:22,910 --> 00:45:25,950 - So I think as you look out say five years, 1157 00:45:25,950 --> 00:45:28,490 you'll either have organizations with modified 1158 00:45:28,490 --> 00:45:31,095 and clean opinions, or they will have a particular 1159 00:45:31,095 --> 00:45:34,240 challenge remaining, and we saw this at DHS. 1160 00:45:34,240 --> 00:45:36,800 They would get down to they had fixed everything except. 1161 00:45:36,800 --> 00:45:38,320 And then all of a sudden instead of having 1162 00:45:38,320 --> 00:45:40,130 a discussion about financial management 1163 00:45:40,130 --> 00:45:41,953 of the audit in general, having a very detailed 1164 00:45:41,953 --> 00:45:44,840 specific discussion about a particular 1165 00:45:44,840 --> 00:45:46,900 challenge in that organization. 1166 00:45:46,900 --> 00:45:48,860 That's a very strong place to be. 1167 00:45:48,860 --> 00:45:51,270 But between five and 10 not only do we wanna see 1168 00:45:51,270 --> 00:45:53,310 folks getting to a clean opinion. 1169 00:45:53,310 --> 00:45:55,910 We wanna be able to take advantage of the data. 1170 00:45:55,910 --> 00:45:57,210 So part of what we're trying to do 1171 00:45:57,210 --> 00:45:59,500 in parallel with this, now that we're having 1172 00:45:59,500 --> 00:46:00,540 every more accurate data, 1173 00:46:00,540 --> 00:46:02,920 and we have the universal transactions and other things, 1174 00:46:02,920 --> 00:46:05,430 how do we use that to drive decision making. 1175 00:46:05,430 --> 00:46:07,259 The Congressman mentioned earlier 1176 00:46:07,259 --> 00:46:09,970 the Brac and real property, well if you don't believe 1177 00:46:09,970 --> 00:46:11,470 your square footage you're gonna have 1178 00:46:11,470 --> 00:46:13,200 a real hard time having a conversation 1179 00:46:13,200 --> 00:46:14,940 about whether you need more buildings or less. 1180 00:46:14,940 --> 00:46:16,474 So you wanna have more accurate data 1181 00:46:16,474 --> 00:46:18,270 so you can be clear about. 1182 00:46:18,270 --> 00:46:21,197 And making use of that data is the real transformative 1183 00:46:21,197 --> 00:46:22,630 effect that we're looking for. 1184 00:46:22,630 --> 00:46:23,463 - Very good. 1185 00:46:23,463 --> 00:46:24,296 Thank you Mr. Norquist. 1186 00:46:24,296 --> 00:46:25,910 Mr. Chairman, I yield back. 1187 00:46:25,910 --> 00:46:28,060 - [Chairman] Thank you, Mr. Langevin. 1188 00:46:28,060 --> 00:46:28,893 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 1189 00:46:28,893 --> 00:46:30,700 I wanna welcome our witnesses here today. 1190 00:46:30,700 --> 00:46:32,830 Thank you for your testimony. 1191 00:46:32,830 --> 00:46:35,410 Let me begin with this question. 1192 00:46:35,410 --> 00:46:37,070 As the Chair of the Intelligence 1193 00:46:37,070 --> 00:46:39,250 and Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee 1194 00:46:39,250 --> 00:46:42,980 I'm increasingly concerned with the lack of clarity 1195 00:46:42,980 --> 00:46:47,493 on the costs, expenditures associated with cyber operations. 1196 00:46:48,930 --> 00:46:50,470 For example this committee needs to have 1197 00:46:50,470 --> 00:46:54,050 a sense of how CYBERCOM has used 1198 00:46:54,050 --> 00:46:56,110 its appropriated money to date. 1199 00:46:56,110 --> 00:47:00,200 And how it is not duplicative of what 1200 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:01,540 the military services are funding 1201 00:47:01,540 --> 00:47:05,100 for organic capabilities and for CYBERCOM. 1202 00:47:05,100 --> 00:47:07,680 So can you tell me how can the audit create 1203 00:47:07,680 --> 00:47:10,461 greater transparency on operational 1204 00:47:10,461 --> 00:47:14,040 and other costs for DOD cyber operations? 1205 00:47:14,040 --> 00:47:15,770 - So the value of the audit is the ability 1206 00:47:15,770 --> 00:47:17,281 to break down the transactions 1207 00:47:17,281 --> 00:47:19,880 to the lowest level, the transaction level. 1208 00:47:19,880 --> 00:47:21,590 The issue with cyber is going to be 1209 00:47:21,590 --> 00:47:24,330 making clear to people the boundaries of the definition. 1210 00:47:24,330 --> 00:47:26,570 So some people by cyber refer to almost anything 1211 00:47:26,570 --> 00:47:28,818 that uses IT which becomes very broad. 1212 00:47:28,818 --> 00:47:31,620 But being able to be particular about what we mean 1213 00:47:31,620 --> 00:47:33,360 and then either through the budgeting process 1214 00:47:33,360 --> 00:47:34,438 set up categories so that Congress 1215 00:47:34,438 --> 00:47:36,740 sees those numbers in its report. 1216 00:47:36,740 --> 00:47:37,850 Right now for a lot of those, 1217 00:47:37,850 --> 00:47:39,160 they're sort of ad hoc data calls. 1218 00:47:39,160 --> 00:47:41,460 We can use the audit findings 1219 00:47:41,460 --> 00:47:43,300 to produce more accuracy in those. 1220 00:47:43,300 --> 00:47:44,403 But you're still working off 1221 00:47:44,403 --> 00:47:47,540 what's the definition and how do we capture it. 1222 00:47:47,540 --> 00:47:48,799 But the level of accuracy in the data 1223 00:47:48,799 --> 00:47:51,277 and the ability to sort on key information 1224 00:47:51,277 --> 00:47:53,480 will help be able to give you a better answer. 1225 00:47:53,480 --> 00:47:55,930 - And so where are we in establishing 1226 00:47:55,930 --> 00:47:58,310 those definitions and giving that clarity. 1227 00:47:58,310 --> 00:48:00,570 - So I know there's a set we used 1228 00:48:00,570 --> 00:48:01,860 this year in terms of reporting 1229 00:48:01,860 --> 00:48:03,540 the dollar amount for cyber. 1230 00:48:03,540 --> 00:48:04,770 I'd have to sit down with you 1231 00:48:04,770 --> 00:48:06,100 and go over that definition and see 1232 00:48:06,100 --> 00:48:07,680 if it's meeting your requirements. 1233 00:48:07,680 --> 00:48:08,833 But that was something that I know we did 1234 00:48:08,833 --> 00:48:11,320 as part of the program to build this year. 1235 00:48:11,320 --> 00:48:13,160 And was part of our reporting to Congress. 1236 00:48:13,160 --> 00:48:14,932 - Okay I'd welcome that if we can 1237 00:48:14,932 --> 00:48:16,963 work on that together, thank you. 1238 00:48:18,020 --> 00:48:19,650 Next question. 1239 00:48:19,650 --> 00:48:23,870 There's been a push for innovation of the audit 1240 00:48:23,870 --> 00:48:27,900 to increase audit readiness, how is the department 1241 00:48:27,900 --> 00:48:29,680 leveraging AI machine learning 1242 00:48:29,680 --> 00:48:33,160 and process robotics to enhance accountability? 1243 00:48:33,160 --> 00:48:34,860 - So there's some very helpful tools 1244 00:48:34,860 --> 00:48:36,450 in keeping the cost of the audit down, 1245 00:48:36,450 --> 00:48:38,680 improving the accuracy using bots. 1246 00:48:38,680 --> 00:48:41,430 I think the Army's the most forward on that. 1247 00:48:41,430 --> 00:48:44,280 So maybe John you can talk to the use of bots. 1248 00:48:44,280 --> 00:48:47,342 - Yeah so we've rolled out robotic process automation 1249 00:48:47,342 --> 00:48:49,600 to look at some of the things we talked about 1250 00:48:49,600 --> 00:48:51,630 when the systems don't talk to each other well. 1251 00:48:51,630 --> 00:48:53,080 The long run solution is to merge 1252 00:48:53,080 --> 00:48:55,440 those systems into a single system. 1253 00:48:55,440 --> 00:48:56,770 That takes time. 1254 00:48:56,770 --> 00:48:58,420 In the meantime we're using robotic 1255 00:48:58,420 --> 00:49:00,180 process automation to clean up 1256 00:49:00,180 --> 00:49:02,970 those unmatched transactions, and those other discrepancies. 1257 00:49:02,970 --> 00:49:05,430 We're at the very lead, early stages 1258 00:49:05,430 --> 00:49:07,260 of exploring the other things you mentioned, 1259 00:49:07,260 --> 00:49:09,190 AI and everything else. 1260 00:49:09,190 --> 00:49:10,870 So I think there are gonna be a lot of applications. 1261 00:49:10,870 --> 00:49:13,950 We're not using any of those at the current 1262 00:49:13,950 --> 00:49:15,880 moment for, specifically for audit. 1263 00:49:15,880 --> 00:49:18,130 But we're in the middle right now 1264 00:49:18,130 --> 00:49:20,810 of figuring out how to and where to do that. 1265 00:49:20,810 --> 00:49:24,420 - Okay, and this is for all the witnesses. 1266 00:49:24,420 --> 00:49:25,807 So do, those of us on the committee 1267 00:49:25,807 --> 00:49:28,450 surely understand that the war fighter 1268 00:49:28,450 --> 00:49:32,020 is and should be focused on the mission. 1269 00:49:32,020 --> 00:49:34,740 However we also understand that the more effectively 1270 00:49:34,740 --> 00:49:36,747 the department's resources are managed 1271 00:49:36,747 --> 00:49:40,172 the more effective our military operations will be. 1272 00:49:40,172 --> 00:49:43,150 And we're gonna get more bang for the buck obviously. 1273 00:49:43,150 --> 00:49:45,682 So the financial management community 1274 00:49:45,682 --> 00:49:49,280 cannot achieve a clean audit alone. 1275 00:49:49,280 --> 00:49:51,515 Our war fighters who are responsible for equipment 1276 00:49:51,515 --> 00:49:53,810 and inventory on a day to day basis 1277 00:49:53,810 --> 00:49:56,460 must be engaged as well. 1278 00:49:56,460 --> 00:49:59,670 So how is the department driving 1279 00:49:59,670 --> 00:50:02,640 by and beyond the FM community 1280 00:50:02,640 --> 00:50:07,450 out of the services and down to the operational level. 1281 00:50:07,450 --> 00:50:08,458 - That's a good question. 1282 00:50:08,458 --> 00:50:09,291 Let me just give an overview. 1283 00:50:09,291 --> 00:50:10,560 And then each of them give their examples. 1284 00:50:10,560 --> 00:50:12,700 One of the things I had been uncomfortable 1285 00:50:12,700 --> 00:50:14,270 and was expecting was as the auditors 1286 00:50:14,270 --> 00:50:15,380 started to pull their samples, 1287 00:50:15,380 --> 00:50:17,070 we might get pushback on the field 1288 00:50:17,070 --> 00:50:19,130 from the level of effort involved. 1289 00:50:19,130 --> 00:50:21,780 But when it came to the types of findings of inventory, 1290 00:50:21,780 --> 00:50:23,230 things that were easily understood 1291 00:50:23,230 --> 00:50:26,270 by the commanders in the field as to their value, 1292 00:50:26,270 --> 00:50:28,560 instead what we noticed was an enthusiasm for this. 1293 00:50:28,560 --> 00:50:30,297 And what the auditors found is a number of places 1294 00:50:30,297 --> 00:50:32,430 where there was strong leadership 1295 00:50:32,430 --> 00:50:34,220 there was very high accountability rates. 1296 00:50:34,220 --> 00:50:36,780 So at Kadena and Osan Air Base, 1297 00:50:36,780 --> 00:50:39,330 14,000 munitions, 2.2 billion dollars, 1298 00:50:39,330 --> 00:50:41,790 auditors came back and said 100% perfect. 1299 00:50:41,790 --> 00:50:43,180 Let each of the services talk in terms 1300 00:50:43,180 --> 00:50:45,630 of how they're engaging their, the military in the field. 1301 00:50:45,630 --> 00:50:47,180 - If you could also include how 1302 00:50:47,180 --> 00:50:49,500 you're using metrics for accountability. 1303 00:50:49,500 --> 00:50:50,930 - [Mr. Norquist] Absolutely metrics, good. 1304 00:50:50,930 --> 00:50:53,065 - Yeah well we measure the accuracy 1305 00:50:53,065 --> 00:50:54,800 of the samples that are taken. 1306 00:50:54,800 --> 00:50:57,800 So we know, so for example if an auditor 1307 00:50:57,800 --> 00:51:00,730 goes into a location to an arsenal or depo, 1308 00:51:00,730 --> 00:51:03,138 does a real property or a general equipment sample 1309 00:51:03,138 --> 00:51:07,510 we count, they might have a sample size of 150 1310 00:51:07,510 --> 00:51:10,010 that they find five exceptions. 1311 00:51:10,010 --> 00:51:12,090 We know exactly what that percentage is, 1312 00:51:12,090 --> 00:51:13,510 and we're tracking that over time. 1313 00:51:13,510 --> 00:51:15,520 And we've made it very clear to our commands 1314 00:51:15,520 --> 00:51:17,060 and our organizations, that we expect 1315 00:51:17,060 --> 00:51:18,740 those percentages to be marching up. 1316 00:51:18,740 --> 00:51:21,781 And then to get into the 99, the 100% range 1317 00:51:21,781 --> 00:51:23,203 within a couple of years which is where 1318 00:51:23,203 --> 00:51:25,273 we need to be for the audit opinion. 1319 00:51:27,770 --> 00:51:28,780 - [Chairman] And Brass we can take 1320 00:51:28,780 --> 00:51:30,330 the other examples for the record. 1321 00:51:30,330 --> 00:51:31,180 - [Mr. Norquist] Record, okay. 1322 00:51:31,180 --> 00:51:32,650 - [Chairman] Yeah, thank you. 1323 00:51:32,650 --> 00:51:34,130 Mr. Banks. 1324 00:51:34,130 --> 00:51:35,750 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 1325 00:51:35,750 --> 00:51:39,800 The audit found a number of outdated IT systems. 1326 00:51:39,800 --> 00:51:42,770 Some of them were decades old that cost 1327 00:51:42,770 --> 00:51:45,880 the department millions of dollars to maintain. 1328 00:51:45,880 --> 00:51:47,839 Cyber and IT are two critical aspects 1329 00:51:47,839 --> 00:51:51,070 of the National Defense Strategy as all of you know. 1330 00:51:51,070 --> 00:51:52,790 I'm concerned that these two aspects 1331 00:51:52,790 --> 00:51:55,420 of the audit have the most notice of finding 1332 00:51:55,420 --> 00:51:57,550 and recommendations or NFRs, 1333 00:51:57,550 --> 00:52:02,550 representing 1,084 out of the 2348 total. 1334 00:52:03,205 --> 00:52:05,275 I've had many service members tell me 1335 00:52:05,275 --> 00:52:09,980 about the poor quality of personnel related systems. 1336 00:52:09,980 --> 00:52:12,030 Service members often need to use several 1337 00:52:12,030 --> 00:52:16,660 interfaces or repeat actions on different platforms. 1338 00:52:16,660 --> 00:52:18,570 This problem is especially prevalent 1339 00:52:18,570 --> 00:52:21,970 in the Reserves as I experienced first hand. 1340 00:52:21,970 --> 00:52:25,950 Mr. Norquist can you summarize the audit findings 1341 00:52:25,950 --> 00:52:29,830 regarding the functionality of department IT systems? 1342 00:52:29,830 --> 00:52:30,890 - So Congressman I think you started 1343 00:52:30,890 --> 00:52:33,070 with what I think, it is the single largest 1344 00:52:33,070 --> 00:52:34,730 source of findings in the audit. 1345 00:52:34,730 --> 00:52:37,090 There's a very large number of old systems 1346 00:52:37,090 --> 00:52:41,622 that we have to either retire, and replace, or modify. 1347 00:52:41,622 --> 00:52:44,370 The personnel ones, things like travel, 1348 00:52:44,370 --> 00:52:46,280 those are ones that are very labor intensive. 1349 00:52:46,280 --> 00:52:48,270 They do not have the automated controls 1350 00:52:48,270 --> 00:52:50,870 that make it easy for people to avoid making mistakes. 1351 00:52:50,870 --> 00:52:52,980 All of those generate frustration. 1352 00:52:52,980 --> 00:52:55,350 So we're looking to systematically go 1353 00:52:55,350 --> 00:52:57,470 through and replace those. 1354 00:52:57,470 --> 00:53:00,280 In our process the CIO is a key lead in this effort. 1355 00:53:00,280 --> 00:53:02,040 And so when we talk about meetings. 1356 00:53:02,040 --> 00:53:04,910 It's not really the FM who's chairing them. 1357 00:53:04,910 --> 00:53:06,040 They're one of the key players. 1358 00:53:06,040 --> 00:53:07,760 But we have one that's acquisition, 1359 00:53:07,760 --> 00:53:09,600 with the head of acquisition who co chairs it. 1360 00:53:09,600 --> 00:53:11,820 We have one where the CIO co chairs it. 1361 00:53:11,820 --> 00:53:14,470 And the point to them is, where as the FM committee 1362 00:53:14,470 --> 00:53:15,710 we're happy to be involved, 1363 00:53:15,710 --> 00:53:18,410 but this is really an IT security issue, an IT issue. 1364 00:53:18,410 --> 00:53:20,680 And the audit's identifying it. 1365 00:53:20,680 --> 00:53:22,530 But it's not FM in nature. 1366 00:53:22,530 --> 00:53:24,100 It's quality of service to the field 1367 00:53:24,100 --> 00:53:25,410 with the accuracy of the data. 1368 00:53:25,410 --> 00:53:26,260 - Got it. 1369 00:53:26,260 --> 00:53:29,400 Of the IT related NFRs specifically, 1370 00:53:29,400 --> 00:53:32,070 how many findings or recommendations 1371 00:53:32,070 --> 00:53:33,620 could you say that would require 1372 00:53:33,620 --> 00:53:37,570 an entirely new system to address the problems? 1373 00:53:37,570 --> 00:53:38,610 - Let me take that for the record, 1374 00:53:38,610 --> 00:53:40,120 and we'll be able to see if we can sort that. 1375 00:53:40,120 --> 00:53:40,953 - Thank you. 1376 00:53:40,953 --> 00:53:42,860 And Mr. Norquist how long would you expect 1377 00:53:42,860 --> 00:53:46,150 the remediation process for those NFRs to take? 1378 00:53:46,150 --> 00:53:48,470 - I think that will be one of the longest poles in the tent. 1379 00:53:48,470 --> 00:53:50,310 I think even after we get a clean opinion, 1380 00:53:50,310 --> 00:53:52,250 there will still be findings and audit 1381 00:53:52,250 --> 00:53:54,410 systems will have just figured out ways around them. 1382 00:53:54,410 --> 00:53:57,860 But getting those down is part of the single largest effort. 1383 00:53:57,860 --> 00:53:59,090 - Okay thank you. 1384 00:53:59,090 --> 00:54:00,970 Last year in the Navy Times it was reported 1385 00:54:00,970 --> 00:54:04,967 that the audit found that "five sites that manage 1386 00:54:04,967 --> 00:54:07,147 "ballistic missile defense elements 1387 00:54:07,147 --> 00:54:09,717 "and technical information were failing 1388 00:54:09,717 --> 00:54:12,627 "to take basic cyber security steps 1389 00:54:12,627 --> 00:54:15,277 "to ensure that information on America's 1390 00:54:15,277 --> 00:54:16,727 "Ballistic Missile Defense System 1391 00:54:16,727 --> 00:54:20,431 "won't fall into nefarious hands." 1392 00:54:20,431 --> 00:54:23,370 Mr. Norquist to your knowledge have there been 1393 00:54:23,370 --> 00:54:25,610 any steps taken to correct those vulnerabilities 1394 00:54:25,610 --> 00:54:26,980 to our missile defense systems? 1395 00:54:26,980 --> 00:54:29,417 - So there are steps being taken to correct on, 1396 00:54:29,417 --> 00:54:31,060 and those would be the war fighting side. 1397 00:54:31,060 --> 00:54:32,583 But just like we have folks worried about 1398 00:54:32,583 --> 00:54:34,640 IT security on the business systems 1399 00:54:34,640 --> 00:54:37,610 through the audit, we have forums that look at 1400 00:54:37,610 --> 00:54:40,350 the cyber security of weapons systems and those programs. 1401 00:54:40,350 --> 00:54:42,200 And those steps are underway. 1402 00:54:42,200 --> 00:54:44,188 - Okay, some of the system flaws 1403 00:54:44,188 --> 00:54:49,188 had been originally identified in 1990, and in 2013. 1404 00:54:49,930 --> 00:54:52,460 I can't find any evidence that those at that point 1405 00:54:52,460 --> 00:54:55,780 were ever addressed or fixed after those 1406 00:54:56,790 --> 00:54:59,100 findings many years ago. 1407 00:54:59,100 --> 00:55:01,090 What is the DOD and Inspector General's 1408 00:55:01,090 --> 00:55:03,166 timeline to reinvestigate? 1409 00:55:03,166 --> 00:55:05,640 - I don't know about the Inspector General's timeline. 1410 00:55:05,640 --> 00:55:06,970 There was congressional language 1411 00:55:06,970 --> 00:55:09,760 that directs us for a series of weapons systems, 1412 00:55:09,760 --> 00:55:11,760 particularly the ballistic missile defense ones, 1413 00:55:11,760 --> 00:55:14,930 to look at cyber security, have the services 1414 00:55:14,930 --> 00:55:17,000 develop assessments of the risk, 1415 00:55:17,000 --> 00:55:18,819 and the corrective action plans. 1416 00:55:18,819 --> 00:55:20,257 That needs to go faster. 1417 00:55:20,257 --> 00:55:21,890 The risk there is very serious. 1418 00:55:21,890 --> 00:55:23,340 I believe the ballistic missile is one 1419 00:55:23,340 --> 00:55:25,760 of the first to start going through it. 1420 00:55:25,760 --> 00:55:27,380 But we need to do better in that area 1421 00:55:27,380 --> 00:55:30,320 because of the sheer risk and vulnerability cyber creates. 1422 00:55:30,320 --> 00:55:31,390 - Got it, thanks. 1423 00:55:31,390 --> 00:55:34,190 In your summary of audit findings, 1424 00:55:34,190 --> 00:55:39,190 464 findings from the FY18 audit related to IT security. 1425 00:55:40,010 --> 00:55:42,030 Are you aware of any of these, 1426 00:55:42,030 --> 00:55:44,874 if any of these are critical weaknesses in the systems 1427 00:55:44,874 --> 00:55:47,700 necessary to maintain the safety of our service members 1428 00:55:47,700 --> 00:55:49,100 and the security of our nation. 1429 00:55:49,100 --> 00:55:51,440 - So most of the ones in the audit are business systems. 1430 00:55:51,440 --> 00:55:55,010 But even then, there's a consequence of business systems. 1431 00:55:55,010 --> 00:55:57,250 Their either privacy data, people's personnel records, 1432 00:55:57,250 --> 00:55:58,934 an individual potentially being able, 1433 00:55:58,934 --> 00:56:01,700 that could be asked if you're not secure. 1434 00:56:01,700 --> 00:56:03,900 Spare parts, making sure the integrity 1435 00:56:03,900 --> 00:56:05,190 of the spare parts information 1436 00:56:05,190 --> 00:56:06,127 to support the war fighter. 1437 00:56:06,127 --> 00:56:07,816 Even though they're business systems, 1438 00:56:07,816 --> 00:56:10,150 it's the business of supporting the military. 1439 00:56:10,150 --> 00:56:11,880 And therefore there are consequences. 1440 00:56:11,880 --> 00:56:12,900 - Appreciate it very much, thank you. 1441 00:56:12,900 --> 00:56:14,470 I yield back. 1442 00:56:14,470 --> 00:56:15,303 - [Chairman] Thank you. 1443 00:56:15,303 --> 00:56:17,090 Mr. Cisneros. 1444 00:56:17,090 --> 00:56:17,923 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 1445 00:56:17,923 --> 00:56:19,960 Thank you gentlemen for being here. 1446 00:56:19,960 --> 00:56:24,647 Mr. Norquist I'm concerned with self audits 1447 00:56:24,647 --> 00:56:26,647 and ensuring best practices. 1448 00:56:26,647 --> 00:56:31,400 So rather than waiting for the next audit to come about 1449 00:56:31,400 --> 00:56:33,360 how are we encouraging the services 1450 00:56:33,360 --> 00:56:35,980 and the various commands about implementing 1451 00:56:35,980 --> 00:56:39,120 processes to find those repair parts 1452 00:56:39,120 --> 00:56:41,504 that may be sitting on a shelf that nobody knows about? 1453 00:56:41,504 --> 00:56:44,181 How are they implementing these processes 1454 00:56:44,181 --> 00:56:48,430 so we can find them before the next audit comes? 1455 00:56:48,430 --> 00:56:50,640 - So we have for each of the areas, 1456 00:56:50,640 --> 00:56:53,440 whether it's inventory, or IT security, 1457 00:56:53,440 --> 00:56:56,140 or financial, we have forums for all the services 1458 00:56:56,140 --> 00:56:58,170 there and give updates and share best practices. 1459 00:56:58,170 --> 00:57:00,118 Did you wanna mention one in particular John? 1460 00:57:00,118 --> 00:57:02,980 - I can just give you a couple of concrete examples sir. 1461 00:57:02,980 --> 00:57:04,940 I mean we, we were just at one of our 1462 00:57:04,940 --> 00:57:08,500 arsenals and depos that one of the things 1463 00:57:08,500 --> 00:57:10,120 we care about is equipment, 1464 00:57:10,120 --> 00:57:10,980 and the inventory of the equipment, 1465 00:57:10,980 --> 00:57:12,120 and the condition of the equipment. 1466 00:57:12,120 --> 00:57:13,650 One of the things that typically happens 1467 00:57:13,650 --> 00:57:15,500 is a piece of equipment is purchased 1468 00:57:15,500 --> 00:57:17,770 and used for a particular job. 1469 00:57:17,770 --> 00:57:19,040 That job gets finished. 1470 00:57:19,040 --> 00:57:20,460 That piece of equipment gets set aside 1471 00:57:20,460 --> 00:57:21,466 and we lose track of it. 1472 00:57:21,466 --> 00:57:22,760 That becomes an audit problem 1473 00:57:22,760 --> 00:57:24,440 because we lose track of its condition. 1474 00:57:24,440 --> 00:57:26,060 But that also becomes an operational problem, 1475 00:57:26,060 --> 00:57:27,440 because now I have an expensive piece of equipment 1476 00:57:27,440 --> 00:57:31,180 that might be needed somewhere else in that plan. 1477 00:57:31,180 --> 00:57:33,877 So what that organization did, 1478 00:57:33,877 --> 00:57:37,060 was they created a system that now ties 1479 00:57:37,060 --> 00:57:39,070 to the inventory of the general equipment 1480 00:57:39,070 --> 00:57:41,857 that reports when it's idol at every day. 1481 00:57:41,857 --> 00:57:43,180 And that allows everybody else 1482 00:57:43,180 --> 00:57:46,050 in the organization to recognize that, 1483 00:57:46,050 --> 00:57:47,340 and then they go in and if they have a need 1484 00:57:47,340 --> 00:57:49,010 for that equipment to use that equipment. 1485 00:57:49,010 --> 00:57:50,310 It's helping our audit records, 1486 00:57:50,310 --> 00:57:51,940 keep the conditions of the equipment 1487 00:57:51,940 --> 00:57:53,550 and the status of the equipment up to date, 1488 00:57:53,550 --> 00:57:54,870 but it's also helping the plan. 1489 00:57:54,870 --> 00:57:56,970 So we have now took that and we have now broadcast 1490 00:57:56,970 --> 00:57:58,560 that across all of our arsenals and depos. 1491 00:57:58,560 --> 00:58:00,190 And that's gonna be a practice 1492 00:58:00,190 --> 00:58:02,600 that they'll all start adopting. 1493 00:58:02,600 --> 00:58:04,967 - Now are we performing, are the various commands 1494 00:58:04,967 --> 00:58:06,920 are they performing self audits? 1495 00:58:06,920 --> 00:58:08,350 Are they goin and doin' spot checks 1496 00:58:08,350 --> 00:58:11,197 of repair parts and making sure that these parts are there, 1497 00:58:11,197 --> 00:58:12,930 and that they're actually working, 1498 00:58:12,930 --> 00:58:15,440 and that we can use these repair parts? 1499 00:58:15,440 --> 00:58:18,020 - So each of the services does an audit of their inventory. 1500 00:58:18,020 --> 00:58:20,095 You know part of this is the auditors come through. 1501 00:58:20,095 --> 00:58:22,030 In the long term what they will switch 1502 00:58:22,030 --> 00:58:23,260 to is checking your controls. 1503 00:58:23,260 --> 00:58:25,170 They will check the way you do your own audit 1504 00:58:25,170 --> 00:58:26,150 if they have confidence. 1505 00:58:26,150 --> 00:58:27,310 At the beginning of an audit they don't 1506 00:58:27,310 --> 00:58:28,700 even assume confidence, they go and they 1507 00:58:28,700 --> 00:58:31,090 replicate the test themselves. 1508 00:58:31,090 --> 00:58:32,550 But each of these organizations 1509 00:58:32,550 --> 00:58:34,400 does a process of inventory. 1510 00:58:34,400 --> 00:58:36,060 Some do site by site. 1511 00:58:36,060 --> 00:58:37,680 Some do 10% a month. 1512 00:58:37,680 --> 00:58:40,300 Others do a whole sweep at a particular time. 1513 00:58:40,300 --> 00:58:41,133 But yes they do. 1514 00:58:42,290 --> 00:58:43,910 - And what are we doing to share 1515 00:58:43,910 --> 00:58:46,980 best practices across the services? 1516 00:58:46,980 --> 00:58:48,530 So if the Army has a good idea, 1517 00:58:48,530 --> 00:58:50,460 like you just said, how are we sharin' 1518 00:58:50,460 --> 00:58:52,720 that with the Navy and the Air Force to make sure 1519 00:58:52,720 --> 00:58:54,630 how this is something that they could implement? 1520 00:58:54,630 --> 00:58:57,040 - So we have a number of forums where we do that. 1521 00:58:57,040 --> 00:58:59,440 We have the regular meetings where we do this. 1522 00:58:59,440 --> 00:59:01,630 We also have training events where we have people 1523 00:59:01,630 --> 00:59:04,470 who've had success whether it's from the service, 1524 00:59:04,470 --> 00:59:06,440 from another agency come and speak. 1525 00:59:06,440 --> 00:59:08,770 Did you wanna give an example, Tom. 1526 00:59:08,770 --> 00:59:09,603 - Thank you sir. 1527 00:59:09,603 --> 00:59:11,530 One of the areas where the Navy's made a lot of progress 1528 00:59:11,530 --> 00:59:14,100 this year is dealing with real property accountability. 1529 00:59:14,100 --> 00:59:16,850 So we took findings we got from the auditor 1530 00:59:16,850 --> 00:59:18,020 and then we implemented a plan 1531 00:59:18,020 --> 00:59:19,310 to do a full and complete inventory 1532 00:59:19,310 --> 00:59:21,530 of our real property over a six month period. 1533 00:59:21,530 --> 00:59:22,917 We finished that in March of this year. 1534 00:59:22,917 --> 00:59:25,320 And the auditors have gone out in April 1535 00:59:25,320 --> 00:59:26,640 and started doing their testing. 1536 00:59:26,640 --> 00:59:28,030 And so far they've identified less 1537 00:59:28,030 --> 00:59:30,340 than one half of one percent error rate, 1538 00:59:30,340 --> 00:59:32,780 which is well within the audit standards. 1539 00:59:32,780 --> 00:59:34,460 We've shared what we've done with the Army 1540 00:59:34,460 --> 00:59:35,640 and the Air Force so that they can 1541 00:59:35,640 --> 00:59:38,473 look at incorporating that into their real property testing. 1542 00:59:39,750 --> 00:59:43,940 - I might just add sir, the three of us meet weekly. 1543 00:59:43,940 --> 00:59:45,770 And then our audit leads underneath us 1544 00:59:45,770 --> 00:59:46,910 they meet weekly as well. 1545 00:59:46,910 --> 00:59:50,350 It's, there's a lot of communication across the services. 1546 00:59:50,350 --> 00:59:52,850 - All right, and what steps are being taken 1547 00:59:52,850 --> 00:59:55,200 to ensure military services, particularly senior 1548 00:59:55,200 --> 00:59:57,210 uniformed personnel are considering 1549 00:59:57,210 --> 00:59:59,490 the findings of the audit and integrating 1550 00:59:59,490 --> 01:00:01,460 them into corrective steps? 1551 01:00:01,460 --> 01:00:03,290 - It's actually in their performance evaluations. 1552 01:00:03,290 --> 01:00:04,850 I'll let Tom, John. 1553 01:00:04,850 --> 01:00:07,835 - Sure, for the Navy the Deputy CNO for Logistics, 1554 01:00:07,835 --> 01:00:10,159 Vice Admiral Smith has gone out 1555 01:00:10,159 --> 01:00:12,840 and personally visited every region 1556 01:00:12,840 --> 01:00:16,340 and met with the various commanders on the ground 1557 01:00:16,340 --> 01:00:18,080 and talked to them about the importance of inventory. 1558 01:00:18,080 --> 01:00:19,313 He's put out a directive that mandates 1559 01:00:19,313 --> 01:00:22,490 them to conduct an inventory last year, which they did. 1560 01:00:22,490 --> 01:00:24,470 And he's worked with the Chief of the Supply Corp 1561 01:00:24,470 --> 01:00:26,670 and the Commander of NASP to develop 1562 01:00:26,670 --> 01:00:27,850 an inventory operations center 1563 01:00:27,850 --> 01:00:29,670 where they go in and they test 1564 01:00:29,670 --> 01:00:32,063 and tract the inventory results by warehouse. 1565 01:00:33,560 --> 01:00:35,590 - Is that being done like on the command level. 1566 01:00:35,590 --> 01:00:38,440 And I'll give you just say, in the Navy, 1567 01:00:38,440 --> 01:00:40,050 are commanding officers of the ship, 1568 01:00:40,050 --> 01:00:41,880 is he being held accountable for the inventory 1569 01:00:41,880 --> 01:00:43,430 that he has there on that ship? 1570 01:00:46,860 --> 01:00:49,487 - Navy commanders in the Navy, are they accountable 1571 01:00:49,487 --> 01:00:50,320 for what's on the ship? 1572 01:00:50,320 --> 01:00:51,170 - Yeah so down at the ship level 1573 01:00:51,170 --> 01:00:52,860 we are tracking the inventories as well. 1574 01:00:52,860 --> 01:00:54,590 So at the ship level, at the warehouse level, 1575 01:00:54,590 --> 01:00:57,038 at the BSO level it's being tracked at all levels. 1576 01:00:57,038 --> 01:01:00,620 Each of our inventory points in our ERP system 1577 01:01:00,620 --> 01:01:02,830 they're tracked the different number of warehouses 1578 01:01:02,830 --> 01:01:06,080 and locations (audio cuts out) 1579 01:01:07,560 --> 01:01:09,310 to hold each commander accountable. 1580 01:01:11,660 --> 01:01:12,640 - Sorry we're running out of time, 1581 01:01:12,640 --> 01:01:14,500 can I just get for the record 1582 01:01:14,500 --> 01:01:16,700 that the other services are doing that same process 1583 01:01:16,700 --> 01:01:19,820 and holding the local commander accountable 1584 01:01:19,820 --> 01:01:21,513 for their inventories as well. 1585 01:01:22,380 --> 01:01:23,980 - [Mr. Norquist] We'll take that for the record yes sir. 1586 01:01:23,980 --> 01:01:25,330 - Thank you, I'm out of time. 1587 01:01:25,330 --> 01:01:26,163 - [Mr. Chairman] Thank you. 1588 01:01:26,163 --> 01:01:27,373 Next, Miss Haaland. 1589 01:01:29,960 --> 01:01:30,830 - Thank you Chairman. 1590 01:01:30,830 --> 01:01:33,290 And thank you gentlemen for being here this morning. 1591 01:01:33,290 --> 01:01:35,533 Appreciate your time. 1592 01:01:37,350 --> 01:01:41,340 The 2019 DOD IG report on the audit results 1593 01:01:41,340 --> 01:01:44,870 listed 20 agency wide material weaknesses. 1594 01:01:44,870 --> 01:01:46,936 One of these was related to environmental 1595 01:01:46,936 --> 01:01:49,910 and disposals liabilities where auditors 1596 01:01:49,910 --> 01:01:53,280 found that the DOD was unable to develop 1597 01:01:53,280 --> 01:01:57,630 accurate estimates and account for environmental liabilities 1598 01:01:57,630 --> 01:02:02,630 in accordance with GAAPA 2014 DOD environmental liabilities. 1599 01:02:04,986 --> 01:02:07,260 Best practices guide. 1600 01:02:07,260 --> 01:02:10,550 It identified challenges the department faces 1601 01:02:10,550 --> 01:02:13,750 which include incomplete fixed asset listings, 1602 01:02:13,750 --> 01:02:16,710 lack of comprehensive defensive wide processes 1603 01:02:16,710 --> 01:02:19,010 and controls for identifying 1604 01:02:19,010 --> 01:02:21,560 and measuring environmental liabilities. 1605 01:02:21,560 --> 01:02:24,820 And the inability to adequately support 1606 01:02:24,820 --> 01:02:27,620 assumptions or factors using calculating 1607 01:02:27,620 --> 01:02:30,540 environmental liability estimates. 1608 01:02:30,540 --> 01:02:33,990 How does the DO, and this is for you Mr. Norquist. 1609 01:02:33,990 --> 01:02:36,930 How does the DOD's inability to develop 1610 01:02:36,930 --> 01:02:38,990 accurate estimates for environmental 1611 01:02:38,990 --> 01:02:41,160 and disposals liabilities impact 1612 01:02:41,160 --> 01:02:44,410 the accuracy of the FY20 environmental 1613 01:02:44,410 --> 01:02:47,110 remediation budget request? 1614 01:02:47,110 --> 01:02:52,110 And specifically that the DASD for environment, 1615 01:02:52,160 --> 01:02:55,380 Maureen Sullivan testified at a House Oversight hearing 1616 01:02:55,380 --> 01:02:58,870 that DOD PFAS for example, the cleanup, 1617 01:02:58,870 --> 01:03:01,530 back of the envelope estimate was two billion, 1618 01:03:01,530 --> 01:03:04,470 but the FY20 environmental remediation budget 1619 01:03:04,470 --> 01:03:07,910 request is only 1.1 billion. 1620 01:03:07,910 --> 01:03:09,730 - So this is one of the very useful, 1621 01:03:09,730 --> 01:03:11,043 when we talk about the tools that we're gonna be 1622 01:03:11,043 --> 01:03:12,970 able to take advantage from the audit. 1623 01:03:12,970 --> 01:03:14,700 So the budget for environmental remediation 1624 01:03:14,700 --> 01:03:17,090 tends to run about a billion dollars a year 1625 01:03:17,090 --> 01:03:19,010 and goes about the rate of inflation. 1626 01:03:19,010 --> 01:03:21,260 So the question is are you making progress? 1627 01:03:21,260 --> 01:03:23,040 What's the real size of the challenge. 1628 01:03:23,040 --> 01:03:26,588 There are standards to use both the auditors 1629 01:03:26,588 --> 01:03:28,630 and the environmental community to assess a liability. 1630 01:03:28,630 --> 01:03:30,930 What's the chemical, what's the space it's in, 1631 01:03:30,930 --> 01:03:32,510 and how do you do the measurements? 1632 01:03:32,510 --> 01:03:34,290 Part of the value for the audit, 1633 01:03:34,290 --> 01:03:36,740 for our community and your use and mine 1634 01:03:36,740 --> 01:03:39,820 is the accuracy of those environmental assessments. 1635 01:03:39,820 --> 01:03:41,280 Are the in compliance? 1636 01:03:41,280 --> 01:03:42,320 The auditors are checking. 1637 01:03:42,320 --> 01:03:44,110 Do you know each of the locations 1638 01:03:44,110 --> 01:03:45,570 where you have an environmental liability 1639 01:03:45,570 --> 01:03:47,430 and are you confident, have you properly 1640 01:03:47,430 --> 01:03:49,260 mapped out the size and scale. 1641 01:03:49,260 --> 01:03:51,173 That will make sure that when we're budgeting 1642 01:03:51,173 --> 01:03:54,520 for it we have an appreciation of the size 1643 01:03:54,520 --> 01:03:58,200 as well as is that liability going down year after year, 1644 01:03:58,200 --> 01:04:00,020 or even with the investment we're making 1645 01:04:00,020 --> 01:04:01,890 is that liability going up and we 1646 01:04:01,890 --> 01:04:03,040 need to take a different look. 1647 01:04:03,040 --> 01:04:04,810 So here's one of the areas where the value 1648 01:04:04,810 --> 01:04:06,190 of the audit plays in a place 1649 01:04:06,190 --> 01:04:07,880 that would not necessarily be immediate 1650 01:04:07,880 --> 01:04:09,380 obvious to someone of its use. 1651 01:04:11,130 --> 01:04:12,990 - Okay thank you for that. 1652 01:04:12,990 --> 01:04:16,860 And so I have just a few followup questions. 1653 01:04:16,860 --> 01:04:19,130 How does it impact the quality of DOD 1654 01:04:19,130 --> 01:04:22,719 environmental remediation efforts generally? 1655 01:04:22,719 --> 01:04:25,370 You kind of answered that already probably but. 1656 01:04:25,370 --> 01:04:27,430 - But what they're doing is they're taking 1657 01:04:27,430 --> 01:04:29,440 on the highest priorities areas first. 1658 01:04:29,440 --> 01:04:31,150 And the ones for which the technology 1659 01:04:31,150 --> 01:04:33,900 is the most effective, but this will allow them 1660 01:04:33,900 --> 01:04:35,480 to be certain that they're not missing something. 1661 01:04:35,480 --> 01:04:37,190 Right that you have a more confidence 1662 01:04:37,190 --> 01:04:39,100 in the completeness of your assessment. 1663 01:04:39,100 --> 01:04:40,760 Identify other areas that you might 1664 01:04:40,760 --> 01:04:43,060 need to be focusing that you hadn't seen before. 1665 01:04:43,060 --> 01:04:44,230 - Okay thank you. 1666 01:04:44,230 --> 01:04:46,630 Because there are real human 1667 01:04:48,520 --> 01:04:53,430 I guess human tragedies involved with this contamination 1668 01:04:53,430 --> 01:04:55,690 of this kind and that, I mean, 1669 01:04:55,690 --> 01:04:59,416 that has to be taken into consideration. 1670 01:04:59,416 --> 01:05:04,110 Not just economic but physical issues 1671 01:05:04,110 --> 01:05:06,800 that have been raised because of this contamination. 1672 01:05:06,800 --> 01:05:11,100 So next what does the DOD need to do 1673 01:05:11,100 --> 01:05:13,230 in order to address the shortfalls? 1674 01:05:13,230 --> 01:05:15,500 And last what is the DODs timeline 1675 01:05:15,500 --> 01:05:18,330 for addressing the shortfalls? 1676 01:05:18,330 --> 01:05:20,710 - So I will, let me take the timeline for the record. 1677 01:05:20,710 --> 01:05:23,020 I will talk to the environmental folks on that. 1678 01:05:23,020 --> 01:05:24,659 But each one of them, they need to develop 1679 01:05:24,659 --> 01:05:27,080 a corrective action plan on either the one 1680 01:05:27,080 --> 01:05:29,070 how to ensure they've captured the full range, 1681 01:05:29,070 --> 01:05:30,870 or how to improve the accuracy 1682 01:05:30,870 --> 01:05:34,110 of their liability estimates for the ones that they have. 1683 01:05:34,110 --> 01:05:35,550 But I think the point you made 1684 01:05:35,550 --> 01:05:38,232 earlier in your comment was very clear. 1685 01:05:38,232 --> 01:05:39,910 A financial statement looks like a sheet of numbers. 1686 01:05:39,910 --> 01:05:41,470 But there is a person who's payment 1687 01:05:41,470 --> 01:05:43,890 is either accurate or inaccurate at the end of the week. 1688 01:05:43,890 --> 01:05:45,360 There's an environmental cost 1689 01:05:45,360 --> 01:05:48,020 that we either captured and are properly treating, or not. 1690 01:05:48,020 --> 01:05:49,410 There's a spare part that arrived 1691 01:05:49,410 --> 01:05:51,520 at the war fighter when they needed it or not. 1692 01:05:51,520 --> 01:05:53,260 So all of these numbers, while they look like, 1693 01:05:53,260 --> 01:05:54,610 it's just a sheet of paper. 1694 01:05:55,768 --> 01:05:57,060 They all translate to real meaningful things 1695 01:05:57,060 --> 01:05:59,710 for the people out there trying to get the mission done. 1696 01:05:59,710 --> 01:06:01,470 - Thank, excuse me, thank you. 1697 01:06:01,470 --> 01:06:05,740 I appreciate that because when these, 1698 01:06:05,740 --> 01:06:07,500 when things like this happen, 1699 01:06:07,500 --> 01:06:09,563 these contamination issues, 1700 01:06:11,350 --> 01:06:15,340 it takes a tremendous toll on not just the person 1701 01:06:15,340 --> 01:06:18,720 who's being affected by it, but the entire community. 1702 01:06:18,720 --> 01:06:20,533 And I feel like we need to, 1703 01:06:21,990 --> 01:06:26,866 we need to think about the humanitarian effects 1704 01:06:26,866 --> 01:06:29,450 that these things have had on people. 1705 01:06:29,450 --> 01:06:30,880 And I yield my time. 1706 01:06:30,880 --> 01:06:31,713 Thank you Chairman. 1707 01:06:31,713 --> 01:06:32,679 - [Chairman] Thank you. 1708 01:06:32,679 --> 01:06:33,512 Mr. Khanna. 1709 01:06:33,512 --> 01:06:35,110 - Thank you Mr. Chairman. 1710 01:06:35,110 --> 01:06:37,180 Thank you all for your service. 1711 01:06:37,180 --> 01:06:39,760 Yesterday the oversight committee 1712 01:06:39,760 --> 01:06:43,420 had a hearing about TransDigm and how they 1713 01:06:43,420 --> 01:06:46,540 basically were ripping off American taxpayers 1714 01:06:46,540 --> 01:06:49,730 by having excessive prices. 1715 01:06:49,730 --> 01:06:52,107 And the Inspector General went through 1716 01:06:52,107 --> 01:06:55,010 part after part where they were charging 1717 01:06:55,010 --> 01:06:58,213 4000, 3000 percent profits. 1718 01:06:58,213 --> 01:07:01,620 And there was bipartisan concern on the committee. 1719 01:07:01,620 --> 01:07:05,170 Congressman Mark Meadows spoke about his outrage 1720 01:07:05,170 --> 01:07:08,693 as did the Ranking Member Jordan, and democrats did. 1721 01:07:09,920 --> 01:07:11,970 TransDigm obviously is a bad actor. 1722 01:07:11,970 --> 01:07:14,710 And one of the things that the Assistant 1723 01:07:14,710 --> 01:07:16,340 Secretary of Defense there brought up 1724 01:07:16,340 --> 01:07:18,759 was it's unfortunate that you often have to have 1725 01:07:18,759 --> 01:07:23,380 complex bureaucracy to deal with a bad actors 1726 01:07:23,380 --> 01:07:27,120 like TransDigm that then slows down the process. 1727 01:07:27,120 --> 01:07:28,810 But one suggestion that came up, 1728 01:07:28,810 --> 01:07:32,320 and I'm curious what you think of that 1729 01:07:32,320 --> 01:07:36,230 is to allow contractors at the Department of Defense 1730 01:07:36,230 --> 01:07:40,690 the discretion to ask for a cost information 1731 01:07:40,690 --> 01:07:43,070 even if it's below a threshold 1732 01:07:43,070 --> 01:07:47,733 if they feel that a defense contractor is a bad actor 1733 01:07:47,733 --> 01:07:49,590 or isn't being honest. 1734 01:07:49,590 --> 01:07:53,470 And so this wouldn't require it in every case, 1735 01:07:53,470 --> 01:07:56,550 but would give them the discretion to do so. 1736 01:07:56,550 --> 01:07:57,974 And I'd be curious about your, 1737 01:07:57,974 --> 01:08:00,870 everyone, Mr Norquist maybe starting with you, 1738 01:08:00,870 --> 01:08:04,300 your thoughts about that or other solutions? 1739 01:08:04,300 --> 01:08:05,970 - Sure I think that's an important step forward. 1740 01:08:05,970 --> 01:08:08,270 So the model that this company did, 1741 01:08:08,270 --> 01:08:09,500 and it's really, it's not a partner firm, 1742 01:08:09,500 --> 01:08:10,900 it's a predatory approach. 1743 01:08:10,900 --> 01:08:12,670 Is they went and they bought licenses 1744 01:08:12,670 --> 01:08:14,510 for things where there was no other competitor, 1745 01:08:14,510 --> 01:08:16,710 assached to large assets like aircraft 1746 01:08:16,710 --> 01:08:19,660 where the department couldn't function without it. 1747 01:08:19,660 --> 01:08:22,340 And if they were under two million dollars, 1748 01:08:22,340 --> 01:08:24,427 the rules don't require them to disclose cost. 1749 01:08:24,427 --> 01:08:25,750 And that was originally set up 1750 01:08:25,750 --> 01:08:27,209 because you weren't trying to hit the same 1751 01:08:27,209 --> 01:08:29,540 reporting burden on every firm. 1752 01:08:29,540 --> 01:08:31,850 And for most of the firms that's not an issue. 1753 01:08:31,850 --> 01:08:33,230 But as you point out, the bad actor 1754 01:08:33,230 --> 01:08:34,990 creates a burden for everyone else. 1755 01:08:34,990 --> 01:08:36,260 By being below that threshold 1756 01:08:36,260 --> 01:08:37,940 they didn't have to disclose cost data. 1757 01:08:37,940 --> 01:08:41,090 They had no other competitors so they could drive markup. 1758 01:08:41,090 --> 01:08:43,580 So that predatory practice by functioning 1759 01:08:43,580 --> 01:08:45,760 in that rule gap is a real problem. 1760 01:08:45,760 --> 01:08:47,319 So I think one of the things you wanna do 1761 01:08:47,319 --> 01:08:48,570 is you need to get the accuracy of the data. 1762 01:08:48,570 --> 01:08:50,060 The question is you also need to figure out 1763 01:08:50,060 --> 01:08:52,320 how to not be trapped in a monopoly 1764 01:08:52,320 --> 01:08:53,720 supplier position like that. 1765 01:08:53,720 --> 01:08:55,960 Whether it's looking at the licensing rules 1766 01:08:55,960 --> 01:08:56,793 or some of the others. 1767 01:08:56,793 --> 01:08:59,150 But you wanna, there's a real problem with that. 1768 01:08:59,150 --> 01:09:02,300 And the need to try and break that monopoly. 1769 01:09:02,300 --> 01:09:04,140 And you know we have a lot of good firms, 1770 01:09:04,140 --> 01:09:06,240 they're partners, they're aimed at the national security. 1771 01:09:06,240 --> 01:09:07,520 And then you got these predators 1772 01:09:07,520 --> 01:09:08,810 that make life difficult for everyone. 1773 01:09:08,810 --> 01:09:10,900 I don't know if any of you have comments on that? 1774 01:09:10,900 --> 01:09:12,659 Or no, okay. 1775 01:09:12,659 --> 01:09:16,159 (speaking off microphone) 1776 01:09:34,450 --> 01:09:36,658 Absolutely happy to work with the committee. 1777 01:09:36,658 --> 01:09:37,658 - Thank you. 1778 01:09:38,570 --> 01:09:39,403 - Thank you. 1779 01:09:39,403 --> 01:09:40,236 I just echo that point. 1780 01:09:40,236 --> 01:09:41,580 I mean that's hopefully one of the things, 1781 01:09:41,580 --> 01:09:44,080 once we you understand better what the inventory is, 1782 01:09:44,080 --> 01:09:46,030 what you have, what's coming in, 1783 01:09:46,030 --> 01:09:47,643 we can do a better job of policing this sort of thing. 1784 01:09:47,643 --> 01:09:49,530 Because the amount of money that the Pentagon 1785 01:09:49,530 --> 01:09:52,360 spends is just an open invitation 1786 01:09:52,360 --> 01:09:55,210 to people to try to gouge, particularly if they don't 1787 01:09:55,210 --> 01:09:56,774 think you're keeping track, very careful track 1788 01:09:56,774 --> 01:09:58,910 of what they're charging, or what they're doing. 1789 01:09:58,910 --> 01:10:00,680 So the better system we have, 1790 01:10:00,680 --> 01:10:02,000 the better we're gonna be able to address this. 1791 01:10:02,000 --> 01:10:03,350 And I wanna work with Mr. Khanna 1792 01:10:03,350 --> 01:10:05,777 as we try to figure out what we could do 1793 01:10:05,777 --> 01:10:08,940 to change the law to help address this issue. 1794 01:10:08,940 --> 01:10:10,405 Mac you have anything for us? 1795 01:10:10,405 --> 01:10:11,503 Well thank you very much. 1796 01:10:11,503 --> 01:10:12,470 It's very helpful. 1797 01:10:12,470 --> 01:10:15,840 And this is going to be an ongoing process obviously. 1798 01:10:15,840 --> 01:10:17,580 But I think we are making progress 1799 01:10:17,580 --> 01:10:18,630 and look forward to working with you 1800 01:10:18,630 --> 01:10:20,210 to continue to do so. 1801 01:10:20,210 --> 01:10:21,936 With that we are adjourned. 1802 01:10:21,936 --> 01:10:24,603 (bang of gavel)